Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumShort-Handed NL Hold'em

I think I should have checked this fullhouse

Results 1 to 6 of 6

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default I think I should have checked this fullhouse

    Hand History:
    View Previous | Next hand for this table.

    Texas Hold'em $1-$1 NL (real money), #1,376,623,058
    Table Nordpol, 18 Oct 2005 11:03 PM ET
    Seat 2: DUECE_ACE ($49 in chips)
    Seat 4: Songdoo0 ($47.60 in chips)
    Seat 6: SlappinYaUp ($237.05 in chips)
    Seat 7: lyonhand22 ($75.50 in chips)
    ANTES/BLINDS
    DUECE_ACE posts blind ($1).

    PRE-FLOP

    SlappinYaUp gets [KD, TC]

    Songdoo0 folds, SlappinYaUp bets $4, lyonhand22 calls $4, DUECE_ACE folds.

    FLOP [board cards 9C,10H,JH ]
    SlappinYaUp bets $5, lyonhand22 calls $5.

    TURN [board cards 9C,10H,JH,KS ]
    SlappinYaUp checks, lyonhand22 checks.

    RIVER [board cards 9C,10H,JH,KS,10S ]
    SlappinYaUp bets $9



    I think checking is a much better play here. anyone agree? why or why not. remember, what is going to make me the most money?
    He who drinks beer sleeps well.
    He who sleeps well cannot sin.
    He who does not sin goes to Heaven.
  2. #2
    Got a read?

    Another $5 to induce a bluff or weak call or even avoid showdown also has merit.
  3. #3
    (no reads)
    Well, on the turn I picked up 2pair but I wasn't happy because that made 4 to a straight on the board. So, on the river I was thinking two things:

    1. He has the queen - he's just calling my last bet since the board was paired (unless he was a complete donkey and thought his Q3 was the nuts). I make less here by betting instead of checking, letting him bet, and then raising.

    2. He doesn't have the queen - he's folding to my bet period. sure he might look me up once in a while but i doubt it. if i check to him i have more chance of making money because he can bluff.

    3. He has a bigger fullhouse and I'm losing no matter what.

    I like betting small like you said fnord, I didn't think of that. You think a $5 bet here or checking the river will more in the long run?
    He who drinks beer sleeps well.
    He who sleeps well cannot sin.
    He who does not sin goes to Heaven.
  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by SmackinYaUp
    You think a $5 bet here or checking the river will more in the long run?
    Betting, players like to check the river behind with lots of hands. If his hand is hopeless, you might draw a bluff on a board like this and I don't think $5 is going to do much to discourage it.
  5. #5
    Miffed22001's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    10,437
    Location
    Marry Me Cheryl!!!
    i think i have to bet here
    enough to make sure he calls and not enough to frighten him off
    Unless i had the nuts or im making a bluff id check behind if given the chance on a large proportion of occasions.
    imo you have to bet here acting first to hope for more money to go into the pot
  6. #6
    You played it fine, you need to get value from a Q, trips or smaller fullhouse. Inducing a bluff IMO is just not going to work, the board is too scary and he will most likely opt not too bluff if he is on missed flush draw. You won't see a bigger full house there too often, he would need to be a complete idiot to slowplay JJ on that board and KK is not very likely.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •