What would guys consider ideal stats for W$@SD%, W$WSF% and Went to SD%? Any thoughts about these categories are much appreciated.
10-17-2007 01:04 AM
#1
| |
| |
10-17-2007 01:57 AM
#2
| |
kind of depends on the games | |
10-17-2007 02:00 AM
#3
| |
I hear that 52% W$@SD is ideal. | |
| |
10-17-2007 02:11 AM
#4
| |
| |
10-17-2007 02:15 AM
#5
| |
![]()
|
|
| |
10-17-2007 03:34 AM
#6
| |
For those of us without such accounts, I think having too high a W$@SD% usually means that you're folding the best hand too often. | |
| |
10-17-2007 03:58 AM
#7
| |
| |
| |
10-17-2007 04:11 AM
#8
| |
UNEXPLOITABLE fnord | |
10-17-2007 07:28 AM
#9
| |
Unexploitable isn't ideal though. | |
10-17-2007 09:48 AM
#10
| |
Those are some amazing stats Fnord, are they recent ones? | |
10-17-2007 10:25 AM
#11
| |
| |
| |
10-17-2007 10:46 AM
#12
| |
Meh I can do better than that. | |
| |
10-17-2007 12:40 PM
#13
| |
| |
| |
10-17-2007 12:57 PM
#14
| |
| |
| |
10-17-2007 01:00 PM
#15
| |
| |
| |
10-17-2007 01:01 PM
#16
| |
was this last month? Your prob the biggest winner at 1/2 when you play. | |
| |
10-17-2007 01:42 PM
#17
| |
No this is october. | |
| |
10-17-2007 01:48 PM
#18
| |
k ur def the biggest winner no doubt. | |
| |
10-17-2007 02:04 PM
#19
| |
is there a 20/17 strat post anywhere coz all i have are the typical stickies. | |
10-17-2007 03:52 PM
#20
| |
| |
| |
10-17-2007 04:12 PM
#21
| |
I like the 3 AF on the turn | |
10-17-2007 05:52 PM
#22
| |
100/100/100 | |
| |
10-17-2007 06:03 PM
#23
| |
pretty sure whenever both your flop win % and showdown win % are above 40 and the two of them together are close to 95ish then you're doing pretty "well" or running "normal" | |
| |
10-17-2007 06:03 PM
#24
| |
| |
10-17-2007 06:59 PM
#25
| |
Can the 100%ers discuss realistic numbers please. | |
10-17-2007 07:15 PM
#26
| |
| |
| |
10-17-2007 07:45 PM
#27
| |
| |
| |
10-17-2007 07:57 PM
#28
| |
| |
| |
10-17-2007 08:19 PM
#29
| |
Thanks all so far. Anymore thoughts are still welcomed and encouraged. | |
10-17-2007 09:03 PM
#30
| |
Greater than 40% W$WSF is pretty solid. | |
| |
10-17-2007 10:02 PM
#31
| |
As long as you win big pots and lose small ones you are fine | |
| |
10-17-2007 10:12 PM
#32
| |
not really | |
10-18-2007 02:36 AM
#33
| |
kmind | |
| |
10-18-2007 02:53 AM
#34
| |
| |
| |
10-18-2007 11:50 AM
#35
| |
Thanks, wasn't trying to come off as an ass, just really curious because I obv. worded it wrong in my OP (100% is def. "ideal") but I just wanted to make sure on things. | |
10-18-2007 02:09 PM
#36
| |
| |
10-18-2007 08:05 PM
#37
| |
![]() ![]()
|
Ok i play too tight then? |
10-18-2007 08:12 PM
#38
| |
You are pretty tight Clar, 17/8.5 is really tight, but it doesn't mean its necessarily bad as im assuming you play low stakes. I'd probably stop calling with Axs to raises and raise more hands in position, even like KTs, QJs, QTs, t8s, etc. | |
| |
10-18-2007 08:29 PM
#39
| |
![]() ![]()
|
I started raising suited connectors from late position today with good effect, and i do raise QJs+ quite often. |
10-19-2007 09:29 AM
#40
| |
Read sauce123's guide to beating games post UIGEA, it has a solid preflop strategy. | |
| |
10-19-2007 11:55 AM
#41
| |
Clar, most 25NLers who make money are actually around or slightly tighter than your stats. I think as long as you are winning then you are doing fine. If you have great postflop game then yeah you can run higher but I suggest you kind of stick to where you are. I do suggest that your PFR increase to at least 10%. AJ and AT are folds for me UTG in almost all cases. Read Sauce's guide but keep in mind that this strat is more towards 100NL+. | |
10-19-2007 12:49 PM
#42
| |
![]() ![]()
|
I'm winning, but my BB/100 is only like 4 over 8k hands. |
10-19-2007 05:39 PM
#43
| |
I agree completely with you it's just a big grind fest. Tbh, most 50NL players and below really don't have a clue about game theory besides the most obvious stuff. My experience is that 100NL is the breakmark where you'll see that people usually showdown decent hands. | |
10-20-2007 03:10 AM
#44
| |
![]()
|
|
| |