Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumShort-Handed NL Hold'em

ilikeaces86 pwns Joe Hachem

Results 1 to 44 of 44
  1. #1

    Default ilikeaces86 pwns Joe Hachem

    PokerStars Game #4828970468: Hold'em No Limit ($10/$20) - 2006/05/04 - 06:14:40 (ET)
    Table 'Ianthe V' 9-max Seat #5 is the button
    Seat 1: Lyric ($1980 in chips)
    Seat 2: H@££INGGOL ($4627 in chips)
    Seat 3: fumbo420 ($1950 in chips)
    Seat 4: B Buddy ($1950 in chips)
    Seat 5: l[Ja_Cks]l ($2197 in chips)
    Seat 6: ilikeaces86 ($2344 in chips)
    Seat 7: JoeHachem ($2221 in chips)
    Seat 8: gandi9 ($3367.50 in chips)
    Seat 9: arulx ($2830 in chips)
    ilikeaces86: posts small blind $10
    JoeHachem: posts big blind $20
    *** HOLE CARDS ***
    gandi9: folds
    arulx: raises $60 to $80
    Lyric: folds
    H@££INGGOL: calls $80
    fumbo420: folds
    B Buddy: folds
    l[Ja_Cks]l: folds
    ilikeaces86: raises $260 to $340
    JoeHachem: raises $800 to $1140
    arulx: folds
    H@££INGGOL: folds
    ilikeaces86: raises $1204 to $2344 and is all-in
    JoeHachem: calls $1081 and is all-in
    *** FLOP *** [7c 3c 9d]
    *** TURN *** [7c 3c 9d] [3s]
    *** RIVER *** [7c 3c 9d 3s] [6d]
    *** SHOW DOWN ***
    ilikeaces86: shows [Ad Ac] (two pair, Aces and Threes)
    JoeHachem: shows [Kd Ks] (two pair, Kings and Threes)
    ilikeaces86 collected $4599 from pot
    JoeHachem said, "nh"
    JoeHachem leaves the table
    *** SUMMARY ***
    Total pot $4602 | Rake $3
    Board [7c 3c 9d 3s 6d]
    Seat 1: Lyric folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 2: H@££INGGOL folded before Flop
    Seat 3: fumbo420 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 4: B Buddy folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 5: l[Ja_Cks]l (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 6: ilikeaces86 (small blind) showed [Ad Ac] and won ($4599) with two pair, Aces and Threes
    Seat 7: JoeHachem (big blind) showed [Kd Ks] and lost with two pair, Kings and Threes
    Seat 8: gandi9 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 9: arulx folded before Flop
  2. #2
    Change your title to: The deck pwns luckbox tourney player of the year.
  3. #3
    Can anyone make a laydown here getting >2:1 with KK? TJ Cloutier?
  4. #4
    Lol Fnord. What I say from Hachem at WSOP was good, at times awesome. Am not aware of millions of suckouts...

    Btw I think against ilikeaces86 this is a clear fold. Not sure I could do it, but you are basically praying for KK no?
  5. #5
    gabe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    13,804
    Location
    trying to live
    Quote Originally Posted by Genitruc
    Lol Fnord. What I say from Hachem at WSOP was good, at times awesome. Am not aware of millions of suckouts...

    Btw I think against ilikeaces86 this is a clear fold. Not sure I could do it, but you are basically praying for KK no?
    luck in tournaments is alot more than just suckouts.

    also, if he had stats on aces, yes he should fold because aces is such a nit!
  6. #6
    Yes Gabe I agree luck in tournaments is a lot more than suckouts. It's timing. But the fact that Hachem was unproven doesn't justify his being given the label luckbox.

    From what I saw he played well. Kanter on the other hand...
  7. #7
    PO$$E$$ED's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,007
    Location
    SITTING ON 'RILLA'S FINGER
    another poorly titled thread with zero content
  8. #8
    LOL. True about the lack of content. What are we supposed to say? Dood should have folded KK? Aces pwns for having aces?
    when the vpip's are high and the value bets are like razors, who can be safe?
  9. #9
    Corey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,162
    Location
    Oklahoma City, OK
    Quote Originally Posted by Genitruc
    LOL. True about the lack of content. What are we supposed to say? Dood should have folded KK? Aces pwns for having aces?
    nope no folding KK just the luck of the draw period


    Corey
  10. #10
    I fold to the three bet for metagame reasons.
  11. #11
    Can anyone make a laydown here getting >2:1 with KK? TJ Cloutier?
    I lay this down.The reraise/push almsot always scrneas AA.

    FOLD!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  12. #12
    Lukie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    10,758
    Location
    Never read any stickies or announcements
    Quote Originally Posted by zenbitz
    Can anyone make a laydown here getting >2:1 with KK? TJ Cloutier?
    No, he's completely pot struck after the 3rd raise. JH is getting about 3.25:1 on his money, almost good enough to call even if aces has aces every time.

    Hachem has almost the exact equity he needs to call here even if aces range is exactly KK/AA here and nothing else.
  13. #13
    Hachem's thought process: who the fuck cares if he has AA I won 7 million and make a bajillion dollars in endorsements
  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by Genitruc
    What I say from Hachem at WSOP was good, at times awesome.
    Hachem probably is a pretty good player. He's still the token tourney luckbox of the year. There probably will be yet another one next year too...
  15. #15
    the only interesting thing here is why was ilikeaces86 playing 10/20 on stars with some of the very best players like b buddy and h@l..
    "Poker is a simple math game" -Aba20
  16. #16
    Muxy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    2,505
    Location
    Canadian LOLUH'S AND AMERICAN LOLUHS
    Quote Originally Posted by Pingviini
    the only interesting thing here is why was ilikeaces86 playing 10/20 on stars with some of the very best players like b buddy and h@l..
    because he can most likley make +EV shots at this game when he see's the situation arise.
  17. #17
    JoeHachem said, "nh"
    JoeHachem leaves the table

    I think that's why you can say PWN.
  18. #18
    gabe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    13,804
    Location
    trying to live
    Quote Originally Posted by Pingviini
    the only interesting thing here is why was ilikeaces86 playing 10/20 on stars with some of the very best players like b buddy and h@l..
    gandhi and arulx are pretty great too

    he was there probably because of that one tourney donk he just stacked...
  19. #19
    l[Ja_Cks]l is a tourney player too. I lost to him heads-up in a $20/180-man SNG a couple of months ago. He was definitely the best player at that final table but I wouldn't have imagined he was good enough to be a winning player at 10/20 against H@££INGGOL, B Buddy, and gandi9.
  20. #20
    LimpinAintEZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    822
    Location
    working myself up to FTR fullhouse status while not giving 1 solid piece of advice
    Quote Originally Posted by WildBobAA
    Hachem's thought process: who the fuck cares if he has AA I won 7 million and make a bajillion dollars in endorsements
    exactly! with KK, and a 7mil $ bankroll, he makes this call instantly - Plus, he didn't just GO AI instantly, he made a substantial raise with a premium hand and then Called a re-raise when he was nearly commited -Come on now - Most players I see won't lay down KK - let alone a multimillionaire who's entire account balance could just be 1/10th of his pokerstars endorsement $$ - everyone talking about pot odds and what a lucky player he is....I call with KK everytime at $25NL and my BR is only $500....Put it this way - If you are playing $5 NL and have KK - Are you laying that down to a $5 AI Reraise? That's about the equivalent of what this probably means to hachem -

    put down the hater-ade people -
    this space intentionally left blank
  21. #21
    Im such a LAG
  22. #22
    lolzzz_321's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    7,476
    Location
    My ice is polarized
    Yep
  23. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by Bmxicle
    I fold to the three bet for metagame reasons.
    ????
  24. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by ilikeaces86
    Quote Originally Posted by Bmxicle
    I fold to the three bet for metagame reasons.
    ????
    Ya, WTF? You get KK so much that you can fold it here to induce re-raises when you have... AA?
  25. #25
    Nice tale of poker.
  26. #26
    Muxy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    2,505
    Location
    Canadian LOLUH'S AND AMERICAN LOLUHS
    Quote Originally Posted by dsaxton
    Nice tale of poker.
    stop being a bag of douche karen
  27. #27
    lolzzz_321's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    7,476
    Location
    My ice is polarized
    Quote Originally Posted by Bmxicle
    I fold to the three bet for metagame reasons.
    sarcasm warning
  28. #28
    Renton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    8,863
    Location
    a little town called none of your goddamn business
    Quote Originally Posted by Fnord
    Quote Originally Posted by Genitruc
    What I say from Hachem at WSOP was good, at times awesome.
    Hachem probably is a pretty good player. He's still the token tourney luckbox of the year. There probably will be yet another one next year too...
    I think that out of the last three wsopme winners Raymer was the only really great player.

    But he IS fat, so....
  29. #29
    LimpinAintEZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    822
    Location
    working myself up to FTR fullhouse status while not giving 1 solid piece of advice
    don't be rippin on Raymer too much - I work at a Patent Law Office and one of our partners here was talking to me about poker the other day - He said he read several of Raymers printed articles and he was QUITE a Patent Attorney - Good player, good attorney -

    I'd still leave that wife of his though if I was that rich - Even if it cost me 2.5 mil
    this space intentionally left blank
  30. #30
    OOOWWWNNNNEEDD JOE HACHEM OOOOOWWWNNNNEEEEDDD
  31. #31
    Quote Originally Posted by Genitruc
    Kanter on the other hand...
    *Vomits*

    How the F*^k did he get that deep?!
  32. #32
    DrawingDead Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Lukie
    Hachem has almost the exact equity he needs to call here even if aces range is exactly KK/AA here and nothing else.
    I disagree. If ilikeaces86's range here is exactly KK/AA
    then from Hachem's perspective,
    ilikeaces is 6:1 to have AA not KK.
    (Excluding Hachem's hole cards,
    there are 6 pairs of aces, only 1 pair of kings).
    So Hachem would need 6.5:0.5 = 13:1 to call here,
    not close to the 3.25:1 he's getting.
  33. #33
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,043
    Location
    Drinking your milkshake.
    I disagree. If ilikeaces86's range here is exactly KK/AA
    then from Hachem's perspective,
    ilikeaces is 6:1 to have AA not KK.
    (Excluding Hachem's hole cards,
    there are 6 pairs of aces, only 1 pair of kings).
    So Hachem would need 6.5:0.5 = 13:1 to call here,
    not close to the 3.25:1 he's getting

    don't really understand your math. Even if aces always has aces here, JH is still only a 4-1 underdog. Against AA/KK it's as Lukie said, according to pokerstove :

    equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
    Hand 1: 22.6177 % 15.59% 07.03% { KdKs }
    Hand 2: 77.3823 % 70.35% 07.03% { KK+ }
  34. #34
    Quote Originally Posted by DrawingDead
    Quote Originally Posted by Lukie
    Hachem has almost the exact equity he needs to call here even if aces range is exactly KK/AA here and nothing else.
    I disagree. If ilikeaces86's range here is exactly KK/AA
    then from Hachem's perspective,
    ilikeaces is 6:1 to have AA not KK.
    (Excluding Hachem's hole cards,
    there are 6 pairs of aces, only 1 pair of kings).
    So Hachem would need 6.5:0.5 = 13:1 to call here,
    not close to the 3.25:1 he's getting.
    how can he be a 13:1 dog here, if he is only a 4:1 vs aces :C
  35. #35
    DrawingDead Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by yyellow
    Quote Originally Posted by DrawingDead
    Quote Originally Posted by Lukie
    Hachem has almost the exact equity he needs to call here even if aces range is exactly KK/AA here and nothing else.
    I disagree. If ilikeaces86's range here is exactly KK/AA
    then from Hachem's perspective,
    ilikeaces is 6:1 to have AA not KK.
    (Excluding Hachem's hole cards,
    there are 6 pairs of aces, only 1 pair of kings).
    So Hachem would need 6.5:0.5 = 13:1 to call here,
    not close to the 3.25:1 he's getting.
    how can he be a 13:1 dog here, if he is only a 4:1 vs aces :C
    My mistake!

    Hachem would need about (6*0.8+1*0.5) : (6:0.2+1*0.5)=3.12:1 to call,
    which he's getting.

    Which agrees with Lukie.
  36. #36
    a500lbgorilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    28,082
    Location
    himself fucker.
    standard ilikeaces86 hand.

    1) Get dealt AA
    2) ?????
    3) Profit
    <a href=http://i.imgur.com/kWiMIMW.png target=_blank>http://i.imgur.com/kWiMIMW.png</a>
  37. #37
    Miffed22001's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    10,437
    Location
    Marry Me Cheryl!!!
    was this a bump?
  38. #38
    Rumor has it this guy spent all his winnings(lost on gambling) This true?...
    30%


    Still looking for my royal flush.
  39. #39
    Quote Originally Posted by ripjohngotti
    Rumor has it this guy spent all his winnings(lost on gambling) This true?...
    mike matusow anyone?
    Wikipedia is the best thing ever. Anyone in the world can write anything they want about any subject. So you know you are getting the best possible information.
  40. #40
    i played blackjack with kanter at the rio at this years wsop he seemd like a nice guy was playin 10$ per hand and busted so i bought him a drink lol. played with dan nassif as well the dude that got 9th this year a couple hours after he busted. he still hadnt realized he had just become a millionaire and was also playing 5$ per hand just to chill and relax, both were nice guys.
    The Real Chris Moneymaker
    www.sonpokeher.com
  41. #41
    Miffed22001's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    10,437
    Location
    Marry Me Cheryl!!!
    Quote Originally Posted by a500lbgorilla
    standard ilikeaces86 hand.

    1) Get dealt AA
    2) ?????
    3) Profit
    everytime i see this it still makes me laugh.
  42. #42
    Quote Originally Posted by Fnord
    Quote Originally Posted by Genitruc
    What I say from Hachem at WSOP was good, at times awesome.
    Hachem probably is a pretty good player. He's still the token tourney luckbox of the year. There probably will be yet another one next year too...
    *bump*
  43. #43
    Quote Originally Posted by Fnord
    Quote Originally Posted by Fnord
    Quote Originally Posted by Genitruc
    What I say from Hachem at WSOP was good, at times awesome.
    Hachem probably is a pretty good player. He's still the token tourney luckbox of the year. There probably will be yet another one next year too...
    *bump*
    In the maybe 500 hands I have played against him he is def a fish at 10/20 NL.(hachem)
  44. #44
    you should have totally said "PASS THE SUGAR!"
    Quote Originally Posted by lambchopdc
    Lets stop talking ABC poker and move on to D, E, and F.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •