This is interesting...

I know this is a very very small sample, but still I am confused.

I basically have the same VP$IP, PF rasie, and AF for NL 25 and NL 50, yet I am killing it in NL$50 and getting killed in NL$25.
Is this just variance? or does this show that my style just doesnt work for nl$25?
Thoughts on this??

Really can't make any conclusions after that few hands but wow that's a bad run in the $25 games. Did you run very bad?

1K hands is absolutely nothing.

You're an aggressive monkey. You'll get called down more at lower stakes.

you cant conclude anything from this sample size.

Originally Posted by Warpe

You're an aggressive monkey. You'll get called down more at lower stakes.

LOL aggressive monkey...that made me laugh.

I know what u mean though...no one respects my c-bets at this limit for 5 or 6 max. I think I am playing those tables very wrong. I should tighten up and be less aggro.

And yes this is a very small sample, and yes I did run very bad...but still I have never lost that many buy ins in a row at $25NL.

Small sample size or not, Warpe is absolutely right. Bet your real hands at $25NL, and give up way more often with "percieved" fold equity, and no made hand.