Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumShort-Handed NL Hold'em

just checking

Results 1 to 20 of 20
  1. #1

    Default just checking

    villain is completely utterly unknown

    Full Tilt No-Limit Hold'em, $6 BB (6 handed) Full-Tilt Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FlopTurnRiver)

    BB ($600)
    UTG ($631.50)
    Hero ($600)
    CO ($600)
    Button ($204)
    SB ($275.40)

    Preflop: Hero is MP with Q, A.
    1 fold, Hero raises to $21, 3 folds, BB calls $15.

    Flop: ($45) 3, J, 6 (2 players)
    BB checks, Hero bets $30, BB calls $30.

    Turn: ($105) A (2 players)
    BB checks, Hero bets $78, BB calls $78.

    River: ($261) 7 (2 players)
    BB checks, Hero bets $201, BB raises to $471 (All-In), Hero folds.

    Final Pot: $393
  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    559
    Location
    Rotterdam, Holland
    yes fold, likely a set, doubt very much it's a bluff
  3. #3
    Why are we betting if we're folding to a raise?
  4. #4
    gabe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    13,804
    Location
    trying to live
    because he check calls with tons of hands we beat but only check raises with hands we lose to
  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by gabe
    because he check calls with tons of hands we beat but only check raises with hands we lose to
    AQ has to be at the bottom of our vbetting range though right? What's the worst hand you'd value-bet here Gabe, or Max or any of you guys?

    What if we have AJ here? Is that b/f or b/c?
  6. #6
    Also, if AJ is b/c, what's the best hand you'd b/f and why?
  7. #7
    ...so we're betting for value.

    meh. I want to check behind a lot here. is that bad?
  8. #8
    Galapogos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    6,876
    Location
    The Loser's Lounge
    Quote Originally Posted by Warpe
    ...so we're betting for value.

    meh. I want to check behind a lot here. is that bad?
    Against an unknown I think it's bad.


    Quote Originally Posted by sauce123
    I don't get why you insist on stacking off with like jack high all the time.
  9. #9
    Jack Sawyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    7,668
    Location
    Jack-high straight flush motherfucker
    I check the turn.

    You bet too much if you were intending to fold to a raise, more than half your stack belongs to the pot now.
    My dream... is to fly... over the rainbow... so high...


    Cogito ergo sum

    VHS is like a book? and a book is like a stack of kindles.
    Hey, I'm in a movie!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYdwe3ArFWA
  10. #10
    Betting bigger reduces our opponents bluffing frequencies, meaning in this spot, he's never bluffing. It gets harrier if we valuebet small and think we might have induced a bluff.
  11. #11
    looks good to me
  12. #12
    nutsinho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,839
    Location
    flattin ur 4bets, makin u tilt
    there isnt solid value here and i dont want to get bluff raised so i chk behind
    My bankroll is the amount of money I would spend or lose before I got a job. It is calculated by adding my net worth to whatever I can borrow.
  13. #13
    I think checking back AQ here makes our river betting range suck hard
  14. #14
    I would of said bet but looking at the hand more closely villain can soooo easily have 33/66/AJ/A3/A6 that betting is really thin on river. We'd pretty much only get value from a hero call with Jx.

    Worst hand id call with here is probably AJ or something.
    Nine to five is how to survive - I ain't trying to survive / I'm trying to live it to the limit and love it a lot //

    Can offer RB deals on most sites, PM me.
  15. #15
    I haven't played this high in a while but.....


    Against unknowns I get scared shitless in these spots because they could have anything really, they've called you twice, so I just check behind.


  16. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by bigspenda73
    Also, if AJ is b/c, what's the best hand you'd b/f and why?
    good post- would be nice to know if he is the 70% of players who dont call Axs in the BB or the 30% who do....

    against a complete unknown your river betsizing seems bad max.
    I got more flava than fruitstripe gum
  17. #17
    if i bet river its going to be goofy
    I got more flava than fruitstripe gum
  18. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by sauce123
    against a complete unknown your river betsizing seems bad max.
    I really thought about the river bet sizing, it was tough for me. Something like 160-150 was probably going to get the same amount of calls as 200-220, if not less imo. 90-120 just didn't seem as good.

    What would you suggest?
  19. #19
    so sauce you probably wouldn't be this river?


  20. #20
    90-120 i think, just based on the unknown dynamic. of course its different for me because i know 99.9% of the regs on stars so when i see an unknown my assumption is strongly weighted towards he sucks, so hes not rly an unknown.

    so given that assumption i fire out 90-120 just based on the fact that hes likely some 40 yr old dude taking a shot who will idly click the call btn and i beat all his bluffcatchers so bet. obv fold to a raise for same reasons...
    I got more flava than fruitstripe gum

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •