|
KQ w/130BBs OOP minraised on QJx flop, line check (2/4)
Hansa Poker 2.00/4.00, hand converted by the iPoker Converter at Talking-Poker
Button ($475.00)
Hero ($513.60)
BB ($447.00)
UTG ($263.10)
UTG+1 ($1121.32)
CO ($526.65)
Preflop: Hero is in the SB with Q K
2 folds, CO calls 4.00, 1 fold, Hero raises to 18.00, BB calls 16.00, CO calls 16.00.
Flop (60.00) Q 3 J
Hero bets 44.00, 1 fold, CO raises to 88.00, Hero calls 44.00.
Turn (236.00) K
Hero checks, CO bets 56.00, Hero raises to 250.00, CO calls 194.00.
River (736.00) 4
Hero moves all-in for 155.60
Villain is 51/17/pretty aggressive, no good read on him besides the fact that he's obviously not the greatest player around. Plan on the flop was pretty much to check/call down unless I improved. Is this a reasonable plan against lagfish?
On the turn there's 230$ in the pot and 405$ left to bet - after spiking top two I should be committed versus this guy when there are lots of worse 2p hands and pair+GS hands, right?
I don't really like my c/r, since he could check back so many pair+draw hands, I'm thinking lead for 165-ish, call shove is better, shoving non T/A rivers if he flat calls? At the table I just thought "he's so aggro, let's c/r ai". Then he makes a supersmall bet, and though it scares me a little Im just not letting go of this hand vs this guy. Raise size okay? Perhaps just stick it all in on the turn to try and rep a semibluff since I'm committed anyway?
|