|
|
 Originally Posted by Ash256
Originally Posted by Renton
Originally Posted by meeloche
I feel like the only time I'd consider doing it is vs a fish that isn't full stacked when I want to play a super wide range vs him even if I'm oop. The problem with limping the sb vs anybody reasonable is your gonna get abused a fair amount and at the end of the day your gonna be playing a pot oop without the initiative which is probably the least profitable way you can play poker. Any hand that you are justifying limping like AJ or A9 or J10 I'd be comfortable raising.
If you are raising a solid range in the sb and are playing well vs 3 bets ie 4 betting, flatting etc then people will mess with you less than if you limp.
Hands like 22-66, Axo, offsuit broadways and such are probably profitable to limp vs most. They are also profitable to raise. However they play pretty poorly on most flops when called and often have to check/give up. They also can't stand 3-bets.
I'd advocate that a range as narrow and medium-weak as this could easily be exploited by inflating every postflop pot.
Which is easily exploitable by adjustments on our end.
Originally Posted by Ash256
Wouldn't it be sexier to take that range, add 50% of 77-AAs, 50% of 56s-T9s, 50% of 75s-J9s and limp3bet the whole lot?
Seems like massive overkill. I just don't see why we have to be able to show up with a big pair in order to make limping certain hands ok.
|
Reply With Quote