Quote Originally Posted by Massimo
Oh, here it is.

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...0&fpart=1&vc=1

Lyric said that if he ran 2.2BB/100 that would = about a 1.78% edge. These graphs just kind of scare me.

Here's something i was thinking about today with varience. I'm pretty sure we all agree that Jamie Gold is a "losing" Tournament player, (or at best a break-even). But he won the WSOP. This means that he'd have to play thousands and thousands of high buy in MTT's before his varience "evened out", and even then he'd probably still be a winner total, even though he's a losing player.

That's pretty ridiculous.
awesome thread... amazing the differences in outcomes that can occur