^ I agree with that. To expand on that point, I think a passive style can work with the right game/seat/villain selection. I often will be multi-tabling and find that I'm playing tight/agg at two tables and a little more loose/passive at one or two others - and the reason is that I've found villains who I can get into pots with, who will keep trying to make me fold. That's a great gameplan if you can keep them betting, and not get caught up playing the same way against the other players at the table. I do it pretty often, and I could almost see it working as a poker philosophy. But you'd have to be getting into pretty aggressive games, with at least a handful of really donkish players; otherwise you're just sacrificing too much EV every time you fail to bet or raise like a standard TAgg would.