Most "poker theory" (2p2) forums are just filled with trolls. The only other venue that deals with in depth poker theory are books. However, most dwell only on the basic (pot odds, implied odds, zzzzzzz) but there are far more intricate and specific situations to consider which can improve all of our winrates. Here's a few things I've been thinking about-

Should we be 3betting a polarized range or a balanced one?
- Does this change by the position of the opener?
- How much does this depend on the wide/narrowness of our expected calling range for the opponent.
- Does this change if opponent is a fish?
-FWIW, there doesn't seem to be a "right" answer here- if you watch the cardrunners videos it seems aba 3bets a very wide, balanced range, while players like CTS and Jman 3bet a more polarized one. All are very successful doing this at the highest stakes....

Why (exactly) does a loose-aggressive style seem to succeed more often as we move up in stakes?

What frequencies should we be either 4bet/folding or 4bet calling as semibluffs? (pre)

ETC...

Anyways, I think almost any "narrow" topic if explored with/without stove, using different villains, images and stacksizes and if people stay interested, could add a lot to this forum and potentially expand our player/poster pool as well...

post if your interested or if you have any ideas...

-Sauce