Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumShort-Handed NL Hold'em

And this one?

Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1

    Default And this one?

    Does he have a set or is this just another shortstack playing with TPTK


    ***** Hand History for Game 2042814644 *****
    $100 NL Hold'em - Friday, May 13, 12:51:19 EDT 2005
    Table Table 36743 (6 max) (Real Money)
    Seat 5 is the button
    Total number of players : 6
    Seat 2: hollandhomer ( $29.6 )
    Seat 3: abgenac ( $51.6 )
    Seat 5: abnyc71 ( $97.05 )
    Seat 6: SlappYou ( $100.5 )
    Seat 4: DennisObara ( $76.7 )
    Seat 1: DeeGreat ( $75.25 )
    SlappYou posts small blind [$0.5].
    DeeGreat posts big blind [$1].
    ** Dealing down cards **
    Dealt to SlappYou [ Ad As ]
    hollandhomer folds.
    abgenac calls [$1].
    DennisObara folds.
    abnyc71 folds.
    SlappYou raises [$3.5].
    DeeGreat folds.
    abgenac calls [$3].
    ** Dealing Flop ** [ 6c, 3h, Ts ]
    SlappYou bets [$7].
    abgenac raises [$14].
    SlappYou calls [$7].
    ** Dealing Turn ** [ 5c ]
    SlappYou checks.
    abgenac bets [$15].
    SlappYou raises [$40].
    abgenac is all-In [$18.6]
    ** Dealing River ** [ 8d ]
    SlappYou shows [ Ad, As ] a pair of aces.
  2. #2
    .





    .




    .

    abgenac doesn't show [ Td, Jc ] a pair of tens.
    SlappYou wins $6.4 from side pot #1 with a pair of aces.
    SlappYou wins $102.2 from the main pot with a pair of aces.



    Remember that whole me slowing down and thinking thing? Well thats what I did. Would you have put him on some weakass shit by the aggressive betting as a shortstack? I sure did. Or am I just lucky that he didnt have the set/2pair
  3. #3
    Trying not to look at the outcome before I respond...

    First, I would have played this somewhat differently. I would have raised him again (probably by the minimum, but maybe a bit stronger) on the flop. You think you're ahead here, don't give him a free card & don't let him take control of the hand by going into check-call mode so quickly. There's a place for it, but that place isn't playing aces on a flop of undercards.

    Given that you did play it that way, I like the check-raise on the turn. It sends a clear message: my hand is strong and I think you're full of crap. Come get some.

    As far as his holdings, he went out of his way to raise you on the flop - I would at least suspect a set, but two pair is unlikely given the board. There's no obvious draws for him to get cute with, so I could easily see a set of anything. I could also see him overvaluing top pair, which is why I'd want to re-raise him on the flop to find out if he buckles under the pressure. To me it's 50/50 if he has you beat or not. Given the way the rest of the hand went, I think you're either doubling him up or taking his stack; I don't see any good opportunities in here to really get a read on him and maybe make a tough fold.
  4. #4
    Given the size of the pot vs the size of his stack, I assumed that there was no way I would fold to a $7 re-raise w/o getting us both committed. Any re-raise would have basically committed us both to the pot because of his stack size. So, for some reason I just waited until the turn so that I could make sure and get the rest of it in in case he was ever considering folding. Now that I look back, I think I should have just re-raised him and let him either fold or push on me and I call.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •