Quote Originally Posted by dsaxton

Anyways, the problem in thinking that a bet might acheive both of these objectives (folding a better hand, or getting called by something worse) is that if his opponent (who we will assume is reasonably intelligent) thinks there's a good enough chance that T-T is good here to justify a call, there's obviously a better chance that Q-Q is good, since Q-Q is ahead of a larger range, so it would make absolutely no sense to fold Q-Q. And if he thinks a fold of Q-Q would be the right play, it would be completely inconsistent for him to call with T-T.
But until you prove to ppl that you're unorthodox, the good players will put you on a hand that makes sense and act accordingly.

If you are villain in hand vs lukie, What do you do with 1010? What do you with AA-QQ? Typically ppl will decide that he has the hand he's repping or he doesn't. If villain decides he's bluffing, he calls with 88+. If he thinks he's value betting, he folds AA in a heartbeat. I don't see what's not credible about this...

Playing AJ like this makes HERO completely unreadable. It forces opponents to play 1st level poker, which can only be a good thing, especially when you know this is how they're forced to play you.