|
 Originally Posted by zook
I don't usually try to pick up pots from the BB with 92o when there have been 3 limpers, but yeah, if the table's loose you might want to make a bigger bet for that.
Why wouldn't you bluff raise occasionally there? It's a great spot for a steal.
If you vary your raise in that spot, I think you are leaking information.
 Originally Posted by zook
If you really think that $6 or $7 is going to thin the field that much more than $5, then it's fine, that's just not my experience.
This POV makes no sense. You've almost always got the best hand, so even (especially if?) if you think that raising to $7 thins the field no more than raising $5, why wouldn't you get more money in with the best hand? You would win more when you win and cut down on implied odds.
You need to be careful that you aren't raising less just to give yourself an excuse postflop to make a weak fold. It's not the end of the world to get stacked with an overpair.
 Originally Posted by zook
Since I read Theory & Practice where Sklansky advocates generally larger raises in late position and smaller ones in early position, I've been raising my normal 4xbb+1bb/limper late and slightly less in EP. I vary based on table texture, but it's been working well and I've avoided a lot of difficult big pot situations oop post-flop. I'll agree to disagree, but I hardly think it's silly.
IIRC, when Sklansky talks about raising less from EP, he's talking about opening the pot and in the context of full ring, where there is a good chance that someone will wake up with a big hand behind you. This makes sense if your opponents will respect your raise from EP more than they would respect a late position open since you will have better options when you are reraised. This is an entirely different situation.
|