Just to solve an small argument. Should i have cont bet here? Both opps are pretty loose preflop, although i've only had 40 or so hands with them.

POKERSTARS GAME #7950352976: HOLD'EM NO LIMIT ($0.50/$1.00) - 2007/01/15 - 12:33:32 (ET)
Table 'Scutum III' 6-max Seat #5 is the button
Seat 1: SirinNabokov ($100 in chips)
Seat 2: BX MIKE ($81.55 in chips)
Seat 3: ooolllaaa ($68.85 in chips)
Seat 4: lllFSlll ($147.70 in chips)
Seat 5: redgrape ($98.50 in chips)
Seat 6: Weak Tite ($111.15 in chips)
Weak Tite: posts small blind $0.50
SirinNabokov: posts big blind $1
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to redgrape [Ad Kc]
BX MIKE: calls $1
ooolllaaa: calls $1
lllFSlll: folds
redgrape: raises $5 to $6
Weak Tite: folds
SirinNabokov: folds
BX MIKE: calls $5
ooolllaaa: calls $5
*** FLOP *** [Qh 6d 6c]
BX MIKE: checks
ooolllaaa: checks
redgrape: bets $14




And since there's so little content, here are the results for entertainment reasons...



BX MIKE: folds
ooolllaaa: calls $14
*** TURN *** [Qh 6d 6c] [2h]
ooolllaaa: checks
BX MIKE said, "u aint got sht"
redgrape: checks
*** RIVER *** [Qh 6d 6c 2h] [Ac]
ooolllaaa: checks
redgrape: bets $25
ooolllaaa: calls $25
*** SHOW DOWN ***
redgrape: shows [Ad Kc] (two pair, Aces and Sixes)
ooolllaaa: shows [5s 6s] (three of a kind, Sixes)
ooolllaaa collected $94.50 from pot

i found them kinda funny...