Solid regulars do not equal nut camping multitablers.
Then what are they? Excellent one-tablers that fold the nuts? I dont understand your statement. You cant be solid if you nut camp on multiple tables? Why not?

There are a lot of mutli tablers that know how to play their cards, cbet, and can make decent laydowns, but they're definetly not solid.
Maybe its that my definition of "solid" needs reworking. What is solid if they cant play their cards, cbet, or make decent laydowns? Isn't that kind of the definition of solid? Or is the key that I'm missing the, "they'll play back at you on the nth level"? I dunno. I dont equate solid with tricky.

Either way, I'm arguing semantics and theres no point to it so it doesn't much matter.

Quote Originally Posted by JohnnyFish
They also reraise more than JJ+/AK because you're short.
Yes, but they don't raise junk from the blinds against two players, and they really don't call preflop pushes even from my short stack ass with worse than JJ+/AK.

The biggest weaknesses I see shortstacking:

A) Reraising all-in on the flop will often get called by top pair mid-weak kicker. Rarely less.
B) Ignoring the size of my stack when drawing.
C) Attempting to push me off my hand by firing second bullets on the turn and "pot commiting" themselves with trash. This is a biggy, and is often the reason I see people stacking off against me with second pair. The combination of this and point A means I often delay my real good pushes one street. If I can really really beat them (like I can beat AA), waiting until the turn is often of negligible difference (sometimes they improve, but most often dont improve enough to matter anyway) and it certainly appears that I get called by a wider range (second pair good kicker as opposed to top pair mid kicker whereas often on the flop I believe theyre folding second pair to my push).