Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumShort-Handed NL Hold'em

Standard flop push?

Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1

    Default Standard flop push?

    Playing some Party 6-max for a change.

    CO is 61/15 after 65 hands. Looks like an overaggressive fish with a wide re-rasing range.

    I don't like check calling this hand out of position against a player who is likely to bet hard. My outs are clean and I feel that I have considerable folding equity here. I think pushing is the standard play in this situation. Anyone disagree?

    Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $ Hero (6 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FlopTurnRiver)

    SB ($89.90)
    Hero ($281.68)
    UTG ($295.98)
    MP ($252.36)
    CO ($199.05)
    Button ($195)

    Preflop: Hero is BB with Q, A. SB posts a blind of $1. CO posts a blind of $3.
    UTG calls $2, 1 fold, CO (poster) checks, 1 fold, SB (poster) completes, Hero raises to $10, UTG calls $10, CO raises to $30, SB folds, Hero calls $20, UTG folds.

    Flop: ($79) K, T, 4 (2 players)
    Hero calls $249.68 (All-In)
  2. #2
    Renton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    8,863
    Location
    a little town called none of your goddamn business
    so you think betting 250 has more FE than just betting 60 or 70?
  3. #3
    Is check-raising all-in bad?
  4. #4
    I'd be tempted to push preflop. As played, I would c/r ai on this flop.
  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Renton
    so you think betting 250 has more FE than just betting 60 or 70?
    Yes I do think he is somewhat more likely to fold to a push than a pot sized bet. He had 160 left to call with.

    If I bet 60-70 he will probably only rarely call and mostly push or fold, I will be forced to call a push.
    If he calls the bet and I miss I'll be in a tough spot leaving me with checking the turn likely as the best move as my FE will be way down.

    I think a set is calling the 60-70 bet more often than AA AK. AA AK is pushing more often than folding, anything less is mostly folding.

    Another viable way to play this hand would have been to check raise the flop all in.
  6. #6
    I now think that check raising all in is the better play, the pot was simply too small to open push. oh well..
  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Cocco_Bill
    I now think that check raising all in is the better play, the pot was simply too small to open push. oh well..
    Yeah, you've got a little too much folding equity with a flop push, if there even is such a thing. A flop open push looks a hell of a lot like, "OMFG I AM DRAWING PLEZE FOLD," at least to me. Check-raising looks a shit-ton stronger, like you're almost saying, "Okay, you put money in.....Now I want your whole 'effing stack, please call."


  8. #8
    Lukie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    10,758
    Location
    Never read any stickies or announcements
    I think check/push is by far the best play here to be honest.

    I don't even know what to put CO on here with his post OOP, check behind a limper, 3-bet a raise from the blinds. But we have a monster on the flop with 12 nut outs, and pushing over a normal bet isn't even an overbet and gives us some FE to boot. Having it checked through is obviously not a concern.
  9. #9
    Not only does check-raising all-in look stronger, but you win more money when he folds. This play is much better than open betting all-in.
  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by dsaxton
    Not only does check-raising all-in look stronger, but you win more money when he folds. This play is much better than open betting all-in.
    yes. that open push is screaming draw, unless you also open push w/ 2pr or lower sets as well in order to keep villains guessing. then it might make sense in context.
    In answer to your question... it depends...
    alias2211.com poker

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •