Surely this isn't the norm??

Last month my winrate at 10NL was dismal to say the least, but this month has started much better - but I am aware this is a very small sample. I downloaded PT3 to check it out and this is the graph of showdown/non showdown winnings for this month so far. Is it standard to be losing money in non-showdown pots? I cant understand why it would be. Cheers.

non-showdown pots = everything that you fold preflop + some stuff you dont.

Originally Posted by Pelion

non-showdown pots = everything that you fold preflop + some stuff you dont.

if PT3 is like pokerEV, then i think its just pots tha you saw a flop.

OP, whats your W$WSF % in PT?

W$WSF = 40%
W$SD = 64%

I dont know what "standard" or "good" figures are for either of these.

Originally Posted by Pelion

non-showdown pots = everything that you fold preflop + some stuff you dont.

It counts ALL hands that did not go to show down. Where either YOU folded, or all of your OPPONENTS folded
So if you fold 72o in MP, this line stays even.
If you PFR with AA and All fold, you win the blinds, and this line goes UP the amount of your blinds.
If you PFR with 67s and get 3-bet big and fold, this line goes down however much your PFR was.
It's probably a good indicator of how much you bluff Post-flop also. I've been bluffing (successfully mostly) a bit in the last month (running 24/16/3) and this is how my graph looks.



Also, my graph (and YOURS) are quite small samples. Nothing much to make serious analysis on yet!