|
 Originally Posted by arkana
How does K8 have straight possibilities that K6 doesnt?
It doesn't
How does K8 not have the kicker troubles that K6 has?
It beats K6 and K7
I dont see the difference between K8s and K6s.
I do. Do I have to really break everything down in fine, detailed print? OK then - K9 and better have straight possibilities, although I really don't expect to make straights involving both cards unless I'm playing at least a two-gapped hand like KT. I still like to play suited kings without much straight possibility, but I think at times you'll end up with a pair of something - either a pair of kings or a pair to your other card - and it's better if the pair of kings has a better kicker, or the other pair is a higher pair with a king kicker rather than a lower pair with a king kicker. In other words, I'd rather have a pair of eights than a pair of sixes. I'd rather have a pair of kings with an eight kicker than a pair of kings with a six kicker. And I'd rather have two pair, kings and eights, than two pair, kings and sixes, on a finished board that usually will look something like KT863. These are all fine gradations, but they make hands SLIGHTLY easier to play post-flop, and they give you a SLIGHTLY better win percentage at showdown if, like me, you feel compelled to show down some marginal hands against bad players who are often playing worse hands. K8 is my arbitrarily selected cutoff point for playable suited kings in multi-way pots. It's not a written in stone rule, but when you have looser pre-flop standards and like to see a lot of flops, you still have to draw lines somewhere.
|