Two river folds, standard right?

Hand 1, villain is way too loose and really passive so I don't know why I'm even posting this.

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $6 BB (5 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FlopTurnRiver)

BB ($1489.25)
UTG ($966.90)
MP ($141.25)
Button ($913.20)
Hero ($594)

Preflop: Hero is SB with A, A.
UTG calls $6, 2 folds, Hero raises to $30, 1 fold, UTG calls $24.

Flop: ($66) K, J, 8 (2 players)
Hero bets $55, UTG calls $55.

Turn: ($176) Q (2 players)
Hero bets $100, UTG calls $100.

River: ($376) 9 (2 players)
Hero checks, UTG bets $781.9 (All-In), Hero folds.

Final Pot: $1157.90






Hand 2: Villain is loose but not as passive as the first villain (more like 32/15/3 or so). The river donk feels so much PLZ CALL ME but I dunno. As I'm posting this I don't know why really, but I thought a lot at the table.

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $6 BB (6 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FlopTurnRiver)

Button ($1104.60)
SB ($482.65)
BB ($827.50)
UTG ($144.90)
MP ($700.20)
Hero ($588)

Preflop: Hero is CO with K, K.
1 fold, MP calls $6, Hero raises to $30, 3 folds, MP calls $24.

Flop: ($69) 5, 7, 6 (2 players)
MP checks, Hero bets $55, MP calls $55.

Turn: ($179) 6 (2 players)
MP checks, Hero bets $110, MP calls $110.

River: ($399) 4 (2 players)
MP bets $228, Hero folds.

Final Pot: $627

I like em both.

Both seem like a flush IMO.

On hand 1 i would considered checking the flop for pot control. Although it's questionable with such a loose passive opponent.