Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumShort-Handed NL Hold'em

two sets OOP vs a very good player

Results 1 to 11 of 11

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default two sets OOP vs a very good player

    For those that dont know he seems to be amongst the top 3 playrs on pacific. He's not that tricky but a really good hand reader. My image in his eyes is probably quite Taggy but he's seen me do some crazy shit too, mostly PF though.

    ***** Pacific Hand History for Game 4739210 *****
    $10/$20 Blinds No Limit Hold'em - *** 09 08 03:07:54 2006
    Table Excalibur 1066 (Real Money)
    Seat 6 is the button
    Total number of players : 6
    Seat 1: Phatigue ( $3386 )
    Seat 4: logbil ( $1448.5 )
    Seat 5: wooder2 ( $1602 )
    Seat 6: kogo9 ( $12937.5 )
    Seat 8: vinny76 ( $1890 )
    Seat 9: Saalis ( $2032 )
    vinny76 posts small blind [$10].
    Saalis posts big blind [$20].
    ** Dealing down cards **
    Dealt to Saalis [ 8c 8d ]
    Phatigue raises [$80].
    logbil calls [$80].
    wooder2 folds.
    kogo9 calls [$80].
    vinny76 folds.
    Saalis calls [$60].
    ** Dealing Flop ** [ Qs, 10c, 8h ]
    Saalis checks.
    Phatigue bets [$175].
    logbil folds.
    kogo9 calls [$175].
    Saalis raises [$600].
    Phatigue calls [$425].
    kogo9 folds.
    ** Dealing Turn ** [ 6c ]
    Saalis checks.
    Phatigue checks.
    ** Dealing River ** [ 5c ]
    Saalis bets [$1352].
    Phatigue folds.
    ** Summary **
    Saalis collected [$3053].


    ***** Pacific Hand History for Game 4739108 *****
    $10/$20 Blinds No Limit Hold'em - *** 09 08 03:04:28 2006
    Table Partagas Lonsdales (Real Money)
    Seat 1 is the button
    Total number of players : 6
    Seat 1: Phatigue ( $1806 )
    Seat 4: gbernard ( $1480 )
    Seat 5: jtchamp4 ( $2607 )
    Seat 6: kogo9 ( $5092 )
    Seat 7: wooder2 ( $4308 )
    Seat 8: Saalis ( $2086 )
    gbernard posts small blind [$10].
    jtchamp4 posts big blind [$20].
    ** Dealing down cards **
    Dealt to Saalis [ 9c 9s ]
    kogo9 raises [$80].
    wooder2 folds.
    Saalis calls [$80].
    Phatigue calls [$80].
    gbernard folds.
    jtchamp4 folds.
    ** Dealing Flop ** [ 9h, 2s, 4h ]
    kogo9 checks.
    Saalis checks.
    Phatigue bets [$150].
    kogo9 folds.
    Saalis calls [$150].
    ** Dealing Turn ** [ 7d ]
    Saalis checks.
    Phatigue bets [$300].
    Saalis raises [$800].
    Phatigue folds.
    ** Summary **
    Saalis collected [$1666].
  2. #2
    Renton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    8,863
    Location
    a little town called none of your goddamn business
    leading the flop seems better in hand one

    maybe a 1/2 pot blocking bet in hand 2 (if he's a good player he'll put you on 55,66,88 a weak nine or a flush draw and he might even raise you with air)
  3. #3
    nutsinho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,839
    Location
    flattin ur 4bets, makin u tilt
    yep i think you should call and lead the turn for 1/2 pot in hand 2, in hand one i think your river bet is too big if he is that good of a hand reader-it really looks like youve got a set and if you get any action he probably has you pwned.
    My bankroll is the amount of money I would spend or lose before I got a job. It is calculated by adding my net worth to whatever I can borrow.
  4. #4
    pantherhound's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    911
    Location
    Love me for a season
    i don't play close to these stakes but penguin every time I've seen you post a set hand you always checkraise?
  5. #5
    1) I like to lead the flop. What was your plan on the turn? Were you trying to c/r again?

    2) Raising the flop conceals your hand better does it not?
  6. #6
    I dont always check-raise, just posting the hands that I have played bad or weird.

    I was going for a double CR but I guess that given the board it was a bad idea. (its better with an obvious draw, that missed)
    "Poker is a simple math game" -Aba20
  7. #7
    My line vrs phatigue is to bet hard from the time I hit...he has called me down quite a lot of time. But then I withdrew my money from there after loosing 7 of the 12k I made the past 3 weeks...Like u said he is rarely tricky and while a good hand reader he has lost a few k to me calling me down with top pair. Ie I would not check raise...I'd go ahead and just raise...
  8. #8
    gabe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    13,804
    Location
    trying to live
    you took the lines that a really good hand reader will see as strong hands. maybe you should try making bluffs like these more vs him.
  9. #9
    a500lbgorilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    28,082
    Location
    himself fucker.
    if he's a really good hand reader then check/call check/raise is a bad line since that's never speculative.

    I'd lead with top set when the PFR checks to you.
    <a href=http://i.imgur.com/kWiMIMW.png target=_blank>http://i.imgur.com/kWiMIMW.png</a>
  10. #10
    gabe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    13,804
    Location
    trying to live
    Quote Originally Posted by a500lbgorilla
    if he's a really good hand reader then check/call check/raise is a bad line since that's never speculative.
    thats why you start doing it without sets
  11. #11
    He's starting to play quite nitty and I have been bluffing him a ton lately.

    I was playing nl1k against you Aquinas and IMO you were playing way too loose. Not sure how you normally play though.
    "Poker is a simple math game" -Aba20

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •