Weak manipulative bet sizing gets me in trouble

opp is straight forward player. Reason for bet sizing: opp in the short time we've played has overplayed a lot of mediocore hands, huge raise sizes to protect vunerabilty. Since we are a little deep i want to induce that sort of raise.

PokerStars Game #11764061108: Hold'em No Limit ($1/$2) - 2007/08/29 - 20:30:01 (ET)
Table 'Caph' 2-max Seat #2 is the button
Seat 1: heybude ($397 in chips)
Seat 2: legspin ($272 in chips)
legspin: posts small blind $1
heybude: posts big blind $2
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to heybude [Td 9h]
legspin: raises $4 to $6
heybude: calls $4
*** FLOP *** [5d Tc 9s]
heybude: checks
legspin: bets $8
heybude: raises $12 to $20
legspin: calls $12
*** TURN *** [5d Tc 9s] [6c]
heybude: bets $22
legspin: calls $22
*** RIVER *** [5d Tc 9s 6c] [Ac]
heybude: bets $60
legspin: raises $164 to $224 and is all-in
heybude:

I do the same against certain villains who I know like to raise when they sense any weakness. So, in the case where I get them to go allin on the river with my weak bets, I always call. It was the plan for the hand so you gotta live with the results. In most cases, they are bluffing I've found.

you got what you wanted, right?

I think you guys are misinterpreting. First two streets were weak manipulative bet sizing. The only hands I really beat than a pure bluff is AK/AQ, which is way less likely than AT, A9,A5, some backdoored clubs. The only hand he's bluffing is something like J8 or QJ which is plausible but i dont think that likely. Yes, there are hands i beat but is it enough? I'm not just going to blindly snap call because i have two pair.