I know that there are pros and cons for both but I was just wondering what would be more productive considering you only have a $100 bankroll.
09-21-2005 03:05 PM
#1
| |
| |
| |
09-21-2005 03:46 PM
#2
| |
Um not enough for either, sry. | |
09-21-2005 09:11 PM
#3
| |
productible, i like it. | |
09-21-2005 09:44 PM
#4
| |
| |
09-21-2005 10:21 PM
#5
| |
i didn't win it i came in scgolfer place and, and i've been lazy cause i don't know that i can send a 800 mb db over email haha. | |
09-21-2005 10:33 PM
#6
| |
I think we can do it over IRC | |
09-21-2005 11:07 PM
#7
| |
| |
09-21-2005 11:08 PM
#8
| |
Try $5 sngs. Best to play at a site with only 10% rake. | |
| |
09-22-2005 08:05 PM
#9
| |
Stop with the random comments guys, YOU ARE NOT BEING PRODUCTIBLE | |
| |
09-22-2005 10:32 PM
#10
| |
You need at LEAST $130 to play 10NL | |
| |
09-23-2005 05:21 AM
#11
| |
So $10 sngs....$300 plus should cover it?? Is 6 max or 9 better??. I wanna produce maximum results!! By the way since there is no basic strategy on $1/2 because fishes will call anything. How do you subsidize the bad beats??? | |
| |
09-23-2005 10:03 AM
#12
| |
You can definately see her nipples. I'm scared. | |
| |
09-23-2005 10:27 AM
#13
| |
Off5th, please change your avatar. | |
| |
09-26-2005 10:02 AM
#14
| |
with 100 you cant play either of those limits, probably have to start at 10nl | |
09-26-2005 03:31 PM
#15
| |
I would push 5.50's at stars or something and when you reach 150 you oculd play .25/.50 but i dont even see that as a good idea. | |
10-01-2005 10:06 PM
#16
| |
![]() ![]()
|
|
| |