|
 Originally Posted by dsaxton
 Originally Posted by Miffed22001
call
hope for a miricle river
if nothing comes then bet how much you want to pay to showdown
if raised significanlty id fold, but even against the supposed set this is tough to lay down unless against a push or big river reraise.
I don't think a "blocking bet" on the river makes much sense. You're concerned about him having a set, and he's almost certainly going to raise just about any bet on the river if he does, so really this only acheives the purpose of a cheap showdown when he doesn't have a set, but it costs more than check-calling if he does.
I think call the turn, then check-call the river. This line causes you to win the maximum if he has a worse two pair by causing him to overvalue his hand, and lose the minimum against a set.
I don't see anything wrong with check-calling on the river, but if you say definitely don't place a blocking bet, then when would you ever use one?
A blocking bet is used so you can set the price you want to pay to see a showdown, and if they raise it, you can be pretty sure you're beaten and get out cheaper than if you check-call a pot sized bet or whatever they decide to throw at you. Put the pressure on them. Most of your 50NL opponents are going to have no idea what a blocking bet is and won't have the balls to raise it much as a bluff. Your still letting them over-value 2pair by calling your river bet, but your also letting yourself see a cheaper showdown. Sure, you might not make as much doing it this way on this particular hand than if you check-call a full potsized bet or push, but if you got too liberal about checkcalling large river bets, you'd be in some bankroll trouble eventually.
|