Does that make it bad vicarously?

PokerStars Game #17984059895: Hold'em No Limit ($0.05/$0.10) - 2008/06/07 - 18:08:54 (ET)
Table 'Telephus II' 6-max Seat #6 is the button
Seat 1: Ragnar4 ($11.60 in chips)
Seat 2: Shishio13 ($9.05 in chips)
Seat 3: jonigerard ($11.40 in chips)
Seat 4: Iskeo ($10.60 in chips)
Seat 5: vednozmagam ($14.65 in chips)
Seat 6: supergoch ($7.15 in chips)
Ragnar4: posts small blind $0.05
Shishio13: posts big blind $0.10
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Ragnar4 [7s 9s]
jonigerard: folds
Iskeo: folds
vednozmagam: folds
supergoch: raises $0.30 to $0.40
Ragnar4: calls $0.35
Shishio13: folds
*** FLOP *** [9d 4c 2d]
Ragnar4: bets $0.70
supergoch: folds
Uncalled bet ($0.70) returned to Ragnar4
Ragnar4 collected $0.90 from pot
Ragnar4: doesn't show hand
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $0.90 | Rake $0
Board [9d 4c 2d]
Seat 1: Ragnar4 (small blind) collected ($0.90)
Seat 2: Shishio13 (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 3: jonigerard folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: Iskeo folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: vednozmagam folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: supergoch (button) folded on the Flop

I called because I had a strong read. He'd raised every Button for 12 straight hands. The question, should I have cr'd here? or cc'd here? Why?