|
Stupid Re-Raise on River?
***** Hand History for Game 2026297602 *****
$25 NL Hold'em - Tuesday, May 10, 01:25:38 EDT 2005
Table Table 36679 (6 max) (Real Money)
Seat 5 is the button
Total number of players : 6
Seat 3: skidmd ( $11.3 )
Seat 6: horndashm ( $23.35 )
Seat 4: Pat ( $33 )
Seat 2: DavidReich ( $15.1 )
Seat 5: dtalexis ( $39.55 )
Seat 1: Tank423 ( $14.8 )
horndashm posts small blind [$0.1].
Tank423 posts big blind [$0.25].
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Pat [ Qs Ts ]
DavidReich folds.
Pat raises [$0.5].
dtalexis folds.
horndashm calls [$0.4].
Tank423 folds.
** Dealing Flop ** [ 8h, Ks, 8s ]
horndashm checks.
Pat checks.
** Dealing Turn ** [ 6s ]
horndashm checks.
Pat bets [$1].
horndashm calls [$1].
** Dealing River ** [ 7d ]
horndashm checks.
Pat bets [$3].
horndashm raises [$6].
Pat raises [$12].
horndashm is all-In.
Pat calls [$6.85].
Pat shows [ Qs, Ts ] a flush, king high.
horndashm shows [ 7h, 8c ] a full house, Eights full of sevens.
horndashm wins $44.95 from the main pot with a full house, Eights full of sevens.
When he called the 1$ on the turn i put him on either a 6 (dumb) or having just picked up a strait draw. When the 7 hit on the river and he raised my initial bet, i figured he picked up his strait...or was trying to bluff at it. Is there any indication here that i should have just called his raise rather than re-raise him?
|