|
 Originally Posted by PokerPatNEU
Sigh i never look at stack sizes i always am thinking people just have 1 buy in for whatever the stakes  What if the stacks were deeper? Say another 12$?
i probably wouldve thought for twice as long then folded, because i dont know the guy at all, and i would then not be getting odds on stupidity.
Also a larger push there would look to me much more like a straight..
He knows i dont have a flush, and is trying to represent a bluff to get me to call with my 2 pair.. but then again, that would probably be giving him way to much credit for intelligence... but ofcourse i didnt know how stupid he was until the hand was over.
or he was hanging back on a flush and is doing the same thing.. either way i'm beat..
he might also have Q5 ofcourse.. 
So many things change though if he was to be deepstacked.. because the way that table came about it just wouldnt have had another deepstack.. It started with just me and cmhsoccer heads up.. and there was no point to that because we were both decent players and though i was sure i could beat him over time it just wasnt worth it, so we just messed around for a while before all the other guys came in... at which point we laughed at them and started completely dominating the table.. no one at the table had seen past the flop until this hand because I, and sometimes cmh, had just pushed them around to the extreme.. Once you add that to the equation the guy might have just been getting frustrated and trying to push me back on whatever he had at the time.
So images and things wouldve been alot different if he was deepstacked
|