Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumFull Ring NL Hold'em

Hate to fold

Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1

    Default Hate to fold

    PokerStars Game #2686479358: Hold'em No Limit ($0.10/$0.25) - 2005/09/29 - 06:12:32 (ET)
    Table 'Dziban IV' Seat #5 is the button
    Seat 1: Suzimusen ($26.60 in chips)
    Seat 2: L H K ($23.75 in chips)
    Seat 3: james75 ($2.75 in chips)
    Seat 4: e_o_h ($4.65 in chips)
    Seat 5: happyasalark ($13.55 in chips)
    Seat 7: ZenKiwi ($20.25 in chips)
    Seat 8: Iwind ($24.75 in chips)
    Seat 9: strikerU2 ($14.75 in chips)
    Admiraler will be allowed to play after the button
    ZenKiwi: posts small blind $0.10
    Iwind: posts big blind $0.25
    *** HOLE CARDS ***
    Dealt to Iwind [Jc Jh]
    strikerU2: folds
    Suzimusen: calls $0.25
    L H K: calls $0.25
    james75: folds
    e_o_h: folds
    happyasalark: folds
    ZenKiwi: calls $0.15
    Iwind: raises $1 to $1.25
    Suzimusen: calls $1
    L H K: folds
    ZenKiwi: calls $1
    *** FLOP *** [8s 2d 4s]
    ZenKiwi: bets $2.50
    Iwind: raises $4.50 to $7
    Suzimusen: folds
    ZenKiwi: raises $12 to $19 and is all-in
    Iwind: folds
    ZenKiwi collected $17.15 from pot
    ZenKiwi: doesn't show hand
    *** SUMMARY ***
    Total pot $18 | Rake $0.85
    Board [8s 2d 4s]
    Seat 1: Suzimusen folded on the Flop
    Seat 2: L H K folded before Flop
    Seat 3: james75 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 4: e_o_h folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 5: happyasalark (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 7: ZenKiwi (small blind) collected ($17.15)
    Seat 8: Iwind (big blind) folded on the Flop
    Seat 9: strikerU2 folded before Flop (didn't bet)

    Really hate to fold after putting so much money in, but most likely he has a set, don't you think? I thought I had to raise this much not to give him good odds for a flush draw. Anything I should have done differently?
  2. #2
    This is one of those highly read-dependent situations.
    If the guy's a donk he has 78, 89, 45, 77, 66, 55, 33, 99, A8, etc - and he thinks you're bluffing (had someone do this to me with 89 the other day but had notes on him so I could call in that situation).

    If he's not, he's got a set. He might also be a donk and have 24.

    Any reads/notes on the guy?
  3. #3
    This was just after I sat down at the table so I didn't have any reads on him at all. Usually when I think someone is playing like that, sitting with the hands you mentioned, I'm wrong and lose cash on it. Today I lost a whole buyin tn someone sitting with a set of fours when I had two pair AA, KK. Hate when people call my 6BB raise with 44 and stuff like that
  4. #4
    that's why you call 6bb raises with 44 and stuff like that


    It's all about implied odds, baby.


  5. #5
    STIdrivr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    604
    Location
    Southern california
    He was in the SB.I think if he had a set he would check to the raiser instead of betting into you. You cant always give people on .25 too much credit.
  6. #6
    I'd say you're ahead here enough of the time to justify a call. It's only another 12$ to call and the pot is around $30. His possible holdings include a lot more hands than sets here. Why lead out a pot sized bet on a raggy board with a set? Can he read you for an over pair or is that your standard pre flop raise? Unless he is a good player with a strong read on you for an over pair that he knows you will pay off, this is a little too aggressive for a set from early position IMO.
  7. #7
    instacall

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •