winrate for 6-max

[Sed]

I just started 3-tabling 6-max 50NL and was wondering how unrealistic keeping my winrate for 2500 hands at 23PTBB/100 hands is...

- sed

[Miffed22001]

I hit 22bb/100 over 8k hands only two tabelling but varience has kicked my ass lately down to 10bbs.
I think, finding the right site and making the most of strategy means that your winrate is sustainable over about 15k hands. After that i think you'll get nipped in the bud like i did.

[arkana]

I just started 3-tabling 6-max 50NL and was wondering how unrealistic keeping my winrate for 2500 hands at 23PTBB/100 hands is...

- sed

Very very unrealistic.

[Sed]

well, as a followup... what is realistic?

- sed

[Funky]

i would tend to disagree with arkana and say that it would be
realistic, for 4 tables 50nl i had just under 18ptbb/100.
although my sample size was only about 9000 hands.
really depends on the times you are playing more than
anythign

[Miffed22001]

Im still going to say that 10-20bbs/100 at multi tabelling 50nl is posible over 10k+ hands providing you can identify weakness and take oppertunities. A few nice flops would help but i think you can

[Cocco_Bill]

sigh...

10k hands is nowhere near long term! Come back when you have 100k hands.

[Miffed22001]

i moved up
yes i know its a small number

[Bmxicle]

100k gives you a good idea, 200k is a good sample size.

Winrates are useless, just make sure you play all your hands well and the money will come.

[Pingviini]

It is pretty funny that when you start playing you think that 500 or at least a thousand hands is a good sample size but after a year of play and tens of thousands of hands you just realize that the sample size has to be huge, especially for NL and especially for short handed.

[Seabass]

2500 is a realy small sample and therefor its very hard to get any solid info about future win rates from it. As said, a good number would be 100-200k, perhaps more for shorthanded games.

A winrate will tell you some of the quality, but you hafto put that in the context of the quantity. Many have one, but not both.

After that little rant, all I can say is that you are a winning player and I think your going to stay a winning player.

[Sed]

yeah, I know that 2500 is small... and I have doubled the hand-count since I posted this originally and the winrate has dropped slightly to 22.6BB/100. I know that I am running hot now (I've had AA almost 50% more times than I should have over this stretch) but wanted to see what the concensus was for how much a good player should be earning. In limit, there are guidelines as to what is a good/excellent win-rate. I was just wondering what I should shoot for in NL 6-max. That is all...

Please no more comments about small sample size, I feel like I need to go buy a sportscar or something to compensate...

- sed

[arkana]

I would say a great player could do about 15PT/BB at the lower levels (25NL and 50NL) and about 10PT/BB rate at 100NL+ over 200k+ hands. Personally I think 5PT/BB at 100NL+ is quite good.

[Sed]

Cool, so 15PT/100BB it is. If I discount my excessive AA rate, that is around where I am running. I'll get back to ya'll in about 97.5k hands....

- sed

[biondino]

I had a £25NL win rate of 46PTBB/100 over 6,000 hands. I felt like I was god