|
 Originally Posted by Fnord
Chris,
I appreciate the effort that went into your post, however you're making a common and fatal flaw of imposing your/our own views on how this game should be played into your analysis instead of really getting into this guy's head. Start with his 46% VP$IP 20% PFR split...
And that's why I've stopped playing for the last week or so. Usually I'm not so bad, and can play off of my reads, but lately, I've definitely been superimposing myself as the other player too much and getting myself into bad-beat situations. Apparently my week off hasn't helped my situation yet..
Ok, so basically, I'm giving this guy too much credit. He's pretty LAGG so his limping range is pretty big, even to include AQ, QQ?? as dangerous trapping hands.
So a 1/3 bet on the flop probably does NOT indicate a draw for this guy. This is a value bet from someone who would attack with a draw. He's possibly slow-playing a big hand, AQ, QQ, QT,TT,55, Q5? T5? and wants to build the pot, not caring about the danger.
Then he does it again on the turn, betting low, hoping for someone to raise him so he can call and trap.
The check on the river solidifies that possibility of a big hand trapping. He's looking for a bet that he can CR AI.
So, realistic hands that he's now on are AQ, QQ, QT, TT, 55. If he wanted to trap with QT, he's probably not very happy now, and likely would've lead out again here. So the more I look at it the more it looks like someone who got his set on the flop, and wants to trap someone. QQ,TT,55. He "knows" that you got your Ace on the turn, so he wants you to bet into him here. So, a "standard" $35 bet on the river makes more sense to me now, as he is definitely setting up for a checkraise. After that all the money goes in pretty quickly I would say.
This is a different analysis from my last one, but it still doesn't feel completely "correct" to me. I feel like I'm missing the cherry on top of the sundae here...
|