|
Value-raise on river here?
Okay...I have a solid read on this guy. He's a pretty damned tight player that has shown down nothing but the goods all night. He has kept his nose out of pots unless he's got the goods, and for some reason people have been paying him off all night long. I've seen him limp AK UTG before and get paid off, along with a few other random two-pair hands. This guy hasn't gotten out of line all night (250+ hands).
NL200, UTG ($750) and UTG+1 Ultimate George ($210)
Ultimate George has: 5 5 
UTG calls $2, Ultimate George calls $2, CO folds, Button calls $2, SB calls $2, BB calls $2. Pot = $10.
FLOP: A 9 5 
UTG bets $10, Ultimate George calls $10, button folds, SB folds, BB folds. Pot = $30.
Okay, at this point I'm putting him on a big-Ace, A9, 99, and...well, that's pretty much it. As I've said before, he hasn't stuck his nose in too many pots thus far...the two time I've seen him have AA he's raised in EP, so I can't put him on that...
Turn: J 
UTG bets $15 (half-pot), Ultimate George raises to $45, UTG calls...
From here I can't put him on two spades...He'd have to have Q and 9 , and I just don't have him pegged for that. I'm still putting him on a big-Ace (maybe AJ ?), AK, A9, or 99. If he has 99 I am going to pay him off.
River: K 
UTG bets $30 (into a $90 pot), Ultimate George reraises to $90, UTG raises $150......Ultimate George shits himself and calls.
Now...Normally, and by that I mean most every time, I'm just going to call his river bet. I realize that people will not call a river re-raise in a situation like this without the goods. To me, though, this bet looked like a "pot control" bet, hoping that I'll cool the jets here in case he's beat. I just can't put him on Q 9 . So instead of missing out on value here I decide to reraise.
Anyone have any thoughts on whether or not this was the right decision?
Of course, he reraises me and I piss myself and call, and he definitely shows Q 9 
Was this play terrible or am I just being too results oriented right now?
I am in the midst of a $1100 downswing (3.5 buy-ins at NL200, 4 buy-ins at NL100), so that's probably just fucking with my head right now...but, given my read (which I felt was a solid one), was this play that out of line?
|