The movie also has a montage where it quotes things like "the plane must have been 75 feet above my car" and then shows what happens when a car gets behind an airplane.
So, how accurate do you think your visual acuity is on an object traveling overhead at approximately 250 knots?
Also, the jet wake is, as noted (and shown on the video), behind the aircraft. Not below it.
Also quotes people saying "it sounded like a missile" or "did not sound like an airplane". Thats because people only tend to hear airplanes on takeoff and landing, where they are traveling at approximately half the speed. That "Missile sound" is caused by red shift -- the movement of sound waves essentially stacking up on each other -- and any fast moving object of decent mass can make it.
It also stated that the only impact on the pentagon was a "small hole" and that nothing that looks like an impact from the wings is evident:
I'd have to disagree.
Later "then the [other collapsed WTC buildings] would be the third building in history to collapse due to fire. The first two, being the world trade center towers." Umm.. Bullshit?
It cites a few office buildings / sky scrapers that burned and did not collapse. Ok. Did they have jet fuel in them?
It then states that the building that was hit "less directly" collapsed before the one that was hit "head on". Anyone whose watched the documentary about the construction of the towers can explain this one. It was an "outer support structure" -- like an exo skeleton. and the 'glancing blow' took out a significant chunk of the support. Like knocking out one leg of a table.
Frequency modulation to manipulate cell phone conversations? Do you think loved ones couldn't tell? Bull.
I still cant get over the "It came right over my mini van! 50 feet or so!" Laugh. Riiiight. You can accurately gauge the height of a vertical object traveling at approximately 500 miles an hour, while driving. Sorry. That was probably several hundred feet above you. People simply have very poor sense of distance in the vertical area without some sort of demarcation. If you look up at a multi-story building can you accurately tell how many feet up the top floor is without counting the floords, or atleast approximating their demarcation? No, of course not.
Now do it while driving down a road at a 90 degree angle to the building, while going "WHAT THE FUCK!?". Your obersvational powers are close to nil.
Then a lady says, "It was traveling real fast, but didnt make any sound" even though it was "50-75 feet overhead". Ok, go go gadget bullshit.
It is so. so. so. difficult to take this even remotely seriously.