|  | 
			
			
			
			
				 My first stacking at $50NL
				
					
						When something all of a sudden went 'click' a few weeks ago, I started crushing $25NL. Not because I was running good (though that was a timely confidence booster), but because I knew how to win the most on my good hands, and lose the least on my mediocre hands. One day I couldn't do it, the next I could.    
 Since then I've had mostly winning sessions and last night I rewarded myself with a crack at $50NL. The opposition seems no different. Tonight I encountered the following.
 
 The table was generally weak-tight. I'd recently had a run of playable cards, so I was in a lot of pots and winning more than my fair share. It was clear to any reasonable player that I was itching to play in big pots.
 
 PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.50 BB (6 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FlopTurnRiver)
 
 saw flop|saw showdown
 
 MP ($41.95)
 CO ($9.10)
 Button ($49.25)
 SB ($46.25)
 salt3d ($55.70)
 UTG ($63.50)
 
 Preflop: salt3d is BB with 8
  , 8  . 1 fold, MP calls $0.50, CO calls $0.50, 2 folds, salt3d raises to $2, MP calls $1.50, CO calls $1.50.
 
 Flop: ($6.25) 4
  , 7  , 8  (3 players) salt3d bets $3.5, MP calls $3.50, CO folds.
 
 Turn: ($13.25) 2
  (2 players) salt3d checks, MP bets $12, salt3d calls $12.
 
 River: ($37.25) 9
  (2 players) salt3d bets $38.2 (All-In), MP calls $24.45 (All-In).
 
 Final Pot: $99.90
 
 I checked the turn to represent overcards, so if I 'missed' on the river, I could overbet 'bluff' and be called by just about any pair. I figured my opponent would value bet any reasonable pair, and may try a bluff when he would have folded to my bet. I didn't check-raise because I thought it would show too much strength and give the lower pairs a chance to get away.
 
 This is the kind of hand I consider 'standard' since that thing went click. On that flop it seems an easy pot to win, but getting paid off is still new to me. Am I playing it right?
 |