|
 Originally Posted by Galapogos
 Originally Posted by Lukie
so you're telling me that you never take into account what you think the other guy's range is, how well they play postflop, stack sizes, what your image is/how they perceive you, position (ignoring a trivial difference in your range, but also stuff like is it UTG/MP or is it BN/BB isn't even accounted for), and that you never 4-bet? That can't be right.
Basically I want to make sure none of these are horrendous calls after being 3-bet unless a particular scenario should dictate otherwise. I know it's kind of an environment specific question but I'm looking for any red flags. I do not call 3-bets with these hands until I have some info on the opponent. But these are hands I make calls with once I know someone is the type of player to 3-bet with a wider range than AA-QQ but nothing crazy. Or do you wait until you have very specific info on opponents when you start calling their 3-bets?
well first, I don't necessarily agree that you have to play super nitty tight against a 3-bet from an unknown. IMO, you have to assume your opponents are at least somewhat competent, and if they are only 3-betting the monster pairs in a shorthanded NL game, then I have a hard time calling them competent. 
substitute 'good' in for competent if you must, the general idea remains the same.
As far as whether or not some of these things are great or terrible, it's really hard to say. In some situations I will call a 3-bet with any 2 that I opened with, while in others, my range might start off very wide and then become absurdly tight when deciding whether or not to call the 3-bet or to just shove/4-bet myself. Honestly you have to look at all factors and even then there should inherently be a degree of randomness in your decisions. As a general guideline, I don't see anything terrible or donkish in your OP if that's what you're looking for, but in NL ring, general guidelines when you're talking in terms of preflop ranges with pretty much no information other then 'you raised, and got reraised' is pretty bad usually. jmho.
A very generic example, which I'm not saying is good or bad or that I'm advocating might look something like this..... say it's a 5/10 game, 1k eff stacks. You open to $40 in the CO with AKo. folds to BB who pops it back to 140, which you estimate he might do with 6% or 8% or 10% of his hands. We will obviously never know the exact amount. If he is playing well, he's obviously going to be adapting to ever changing conditions and there will be a certain amount of randomness in his game as well. Say in this instance, we call 35% of the time, push 35% of the time, and 4-bet to an amount less then a push 30% of the time. While the numbers may not be close to ideal, this makes it much more difficult to play against you then some clown that tells you to push, or call, or fold, or 4-bet less then a push like it's some absolute decision.
|