Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumFTR Community

Wow; apparently, I suck

Results 1 to 28 of 28
  1. #1
    ensign_lee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    4,270
    Location
    The University of TEXAS at Austin

    Default Wow; apparently, I suck

    ...at poker
    http://www.donkeytest.com/report.htm...220-1171873681

    wtf happened? You take a year and a half off, only playing sparingly and this iis what happens to your game? F*#^

    Highlights:
    Your Tournament Play score of 20% is significantly lower than your average percentile score.This score is better than 2.28% of all persons taking this test.

    Your General Poker IQ Score is 93 and shows how skilled you are in general. Anyone with a score this high is considered to be an average player. This score is better than 25.25% of all persons taking this test. You should expect to lose slowly in raked casino games and break even in homegames or in unraked games.

    ---
    Computational speed wasn't really fair. I was doing other things while taking the test.

    But still...



    And that took like 40 minutes of life that I should have spent studying for my entrepreneurial finance exam. crap.
  2. #2
    bigred's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    15,437
    Location
    Nest of Douchebags
    I think you're bad because you think this test reflects your abilities, not because of your score.
    LOL OPERATIONS
  3. #3
    Sykedupp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    1,087
    Location
    Vancouver, BC, Canada
    http://www.donkeytest.com/report.htm...220-1171877135

    it's funny cause I'm a tourney pro, yet tourneys are by far my worst results, along with big pairs... Guess im a donk

    -Chris
    Quote Originally Posted by soupie
    That is the beauty of poker, it doesnt matter how they play, you can always devise the perfect defense and counterpunch hard.
  4. #4
    thenonsequitur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,311
    Location
    Location: Location
    http://www.donkeytest.com/report.htm...253-1171879775

    My PokerIQ is 117, in the 76th percentile, which of people who take this test can't be right, because I'm really not very good at NL. I probably just guessed correctly a lot.

    "Your Small and Medium Pairs score ... is better than 99.69% of all persons taking this test." Um, how is set-camping better than 99.69% of how all people play?

    Also, tournaments and big pairs also had far my weakest scores in these test results, but I know that in actuality these are definitely not the weakest points in my game.
  5. #5
    It's just all technical aspects of the game. It takes a lot more than technical stuff to be a great player.
  6. #6
    gabe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    13,804
    Location
    trying to live
    thats such a stupid test anyway
  7. #7
    gabe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    13,804
    Location
    trying to live
    i got a 138 IQ. half the questions were stupid for too many reasons.


    btw my tourney play is 34%
  8. #8
    gabe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    13,804
    Location
    trying to live
    iowaskinfan's friend wrote this
  9. #9
    I'm a 20NL grinder who got 131. I tanked a lot of the questions for a fair amount of time though.
  10. #10
    a500lbgorilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    28,082
    Location
    himself fucker.
    I got a 79, that's like a C+ right?! No bad.
    <a href=http://i.imgur.com/kWiMIMW.png target=_blank>http://i.imgur.com/kWiMIMW.png</a>
  11. #11
    bigred's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    15,437
    Location
    Nest of Douchebags
    Quote Originally Posted by gabe
    thats such a stupid test anyway
    LOL OPERATIONS
  12. #12
    swiggidy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    7,876
    Location
    Waiting in the shadows ...
    Quote Originally Posted by a500lbgorilla
    I got a 79, that's like a C+ right?! No bad.
    No that's like mentally retarded. If they so a WSOP at the Special Olympics this year you should do well.
    (\__/)
    (='.'=)
    (")_(")
  13. #13
    gp in his blog wrote that he thought the test was interesting.
    Yeah Lyric wrote it. That's like the billionth time I've written that on this forum.
    Check out the new blog!!!
  14. #14
    ensign_lee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    4,270
    Location
    The University of TEXAS at Austin
    I hate your friend iowa.

    That is all

    {quietly working to get you banned }
  15. #15
    i took the test while 8 tabling and got a 124. I can see how it can tell you your a donkey, but i dont think its the end all of how good of a player you are.
  16. #16
    http://www.donkeytest.com/report.htm...374-1171931619

    133...Anyone with a score this high is considered to be a high stakes pro

    i play .25/.50nl and havent played poker in a few months
  17. #17
  18. #18
    ensign_lee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    4,270
    Location
    The University of TEXAS at Austin
    Y'all are NOT making me feel better.

    I play $1/$2 NL whenever I play, which is sparingly, like every month or so, if that.

    But y'all are probably right. This test shouldn't be the end-all be-all way to quantify my skill.
  19. #19
    Galapogos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    6,876
    Location
    The Loser's Lounge
    http://www.donkeytest.com/report.htm...308-1171934515

    Wow, appartently this test think I'm a positional and small/medium pair prodigy. W00t!

    I don't think this test can tell you a lot either. But it did nail me on sucking with big pocket pairs. Oh AA, I will tame you yet my fierce friend.

    Anyone else fold the last hand in the test because you know not to fuck with KGB?


    Quote Originally Posted by sauce123
    I don't get why you insist on stacking off with like jack high all the time.
  20. #20
    a500lbgorilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    28,082
    Location
    himself fucker.
    Iowaskinsfan, pm me the correct answers plz.
    <a href=http://i.imgur.com/kWiMIMW.png target=_blank>http://i.imgur.com/kWiMIMW.png</a>
  21. #21
    I would be really interested to hear what the "correct" answer is to this question. This hand is exactly the same as the one in Barry Greenstein's book where Barry folds and his opponent shows a set of Aces. I'm wondering if the creators of the quiz gave more points for folding because I really think calling is the more profitable play in the long run. But I admit that I put fold because I thought that it would get me more points on the quiz. I guess I leveled the test makers.

    I just don't think you can put a guy squarely on AA here if you've only played with him for an hour total. In a live tournament that's like what 20-25 hands?

    40. Tournament. The blinds are at 25/50 with no ante. You have 3200 chips in early position and raise to 150 with:

    :Qc::Qs:

    It is folded around to the small blind with 2200 chips. He has played 2 hands during the hour he's been at the table, and this is the first hand he has raised. He confidently re-raises to 350. You call. The flop is:

    :Qh::As:

    SB checks. You check. Turn is:


    SB bets 250. You call. River is:



    SB moves all-in quickly for his remaining 1600 chips. What should you do?

    Fold
    Call
  22. #22
    Quote Originally Posted by WildBobAA
    I would be really interested to hear what the "correct" answer is to this question. This hand is exactly the same as the one in Barry Greenstein's book where Barry folds and his opponent shows a set of Aces. I'm wondering if the creators of the quiz gave more points for folding because I really think calling is the more profitable play in the long run. But I admit that I put fold because I thought that it would get me more points on the quiz. I guess I leveled the test makers.

    I just don't think you can put a guy squarely on AA here if you've only played with him for an hour total. In a live tournament that's like what 20-25 hands?

    40. Tournament. The blinds are at 25/50 with no ante. You have 3200 chips in early position and raise to 150 with:

    :Qc::Qs:

    It is folded around to the small blind with 2200 chips. He has played 2 hands during the hour he's been at the table, and this is the first hand he has raised. He confidently re-raises to 350. You call. The flop is:

    :Qh::As:

    SB checks. You check. Turn is:


    SB bets 250. You call. River is:



    SB moves all-in quickly for his remaining 1600 chips. What should you do?

    Fold
    Call
    i said call.

    If it's out of Barry Greensteins book and his answer is fold then the correct answer (and by correct i mean donkeytest.com correct) is fold.
    Check out the new blog!!!
  23. #23
    gabe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    13,804
    Location
    trying to live
    yea but thats so lame. lyric leaves alot of factors that i would consider out of alot of questions. that hand cant be evaluated how it was written.
  24. #24
    ensign_lee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    4,270
    Location
    The University of TEXAS at Austin
    wtf? How can that POSSIBLY be fold?

    Against unknown? Calling has to be ++++++++++EV there.

    Then again, apparently, I'm a donk. Still though; that makes NO SENSE to me to fold there.
  25. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by gabe
    yea but thats so lame. lyric leaves alot of factors that i would consider out of alot of questions. that hand cant be evaluated how it was written.
    He's working at it. He fixes stuff every day, that's why it's only in Beta right now.

    He told me he's probably taking the greenstein one out.
    Check out the new blog!!!
  26. #26
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,043
    Location
    Drinking your milkshake.
    I got 132.

    I'd be interested to see the 'correct answers' but I couldn't find them on the site anywhere.
  27. #27
    gabe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    13,804
    Location
    trying to live
    Quote Originally Posted by IowaSkinsFan
    Quote Originally Posted by gabe
    yea but thats so lame. lyric leaves alot of factors that i would consider out of alot of questions. that hand cant be evaluated how it was written.
    He's working at it. He fixes stuff every day, that's why it's only in Beta right now.

    He told me he's probably taking the greenstein one out.
    cool

    i had a small pm convo with him on 2p2 but i wasnt too helpful because it was early and i was grouchy
  28. #28
    Renton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    8,863
    Location
    a little town called none of your goddamn business
    133

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •