Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumShort-Handed NL Hold'em

3 Big pots (100NL)

Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Legendash's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    585
    Location
    Crypto 6max 100NL

    Default 3 Big pots (100NL)

    3 huge pots here. Just wondering if you guys would play these differently? Sorry if these are really standard. These hands are at pokerchamps so the action is rather fishier than your standard US friendly site.

    Emily Rose and T1ts are fish, the other guy is ok. People just kept pushing but I couldn't find a fold to any of them as they were short.

    ***** PokerChamps Hand History for Game 200923977 *****
    NL $0.50/$1 Texas Hold'em - Monday, April 23, 14:52:33 GMT 2007
    Table Fluorine 06 6-max (Real Money)
    Seat 5 is the button
    Total number of active players : 6
    Seat 1: emilyrose ( $21.05 )
    Seat 2: T1TS ( $267.14 )
    Seat 3: speeler ( $140.25 )
    Seat 4: crazyvik ( $126.53 )
    Seat 5: Legendash ( $91.50 )
    Seat 6: byomaaan ( $35.86 )
    byomaaan posts small blind [$0.50]
    emilyrose posts big blind [$1]
    ** Dealing down cards **
    Dealt to Legendash [ :Ac:, :Ad: ]
    T1TS calls [$1]
    speeler folds
    crazyvik folds
    Legendash raises to [$4]
    byomaaan calls [$3.50]
    emilyrose calls [$3]
    T1TS calls [$3]
    ** Dealing Flop ** [ :Qh:, , :Ts: ]
    byomaaan checks
    emilyrose goes all-in
    emilyrose bets [$17.05]
    T1TS calls [$17.05]
    Legendash calls [$17.05]
    byomaaan goes all-in
    byomaaan raises to [$31.86]
    T1TS calls [$14.81]
    Legendash calls [$14.81]
    ** Dealing Turn ** [ 7c ]
    T1TS checks
    Legendash goes all-in
    Legendash bets [$55.64]
    T1TS calls [$55.64]





    Julie is a 35/12/1.4

    ***** PokerChamps Hand History for Game 200945913 *****
    NL $0.50/$1 Texas Hold'em - Monday, April 23, 15:58:27 GMT 2007
    Table Fluorine 08 6-max (Real Money)
    Seat 1 is the button
    Total number of active players : 6
    Seat 1: Julie21 ( $204.52 )
    Seat 2: gossyboy ( $45 )
    Seat 3: j0e_ ( $108.97 )
    Seat 4: Spader7 ( $95.30 )
    Seat 5: Legendash ( $130.45 )
    Seat 6: fradiavolo ( $60.40 )
    gossyboy posts small blind [$0.50]
    j0e_ posts big blind [$1]
    ** Dealing down cards **
    Dealt to Legendash [ :Ac:, :Ad: ]
    Spader7 folds
    Legendash raises to [$3.90]
    fradiavolo folds
    Julie21 calls [$3.90]
    gossyboy folds
    j0e_ calls [$2.90]
    ** Dealing Flop ** [ , , ]
    j0e_ checks
    Legendash bets [$8]
    Julie21 calls [$8]
    j0e_ folds
    ** Dealing Turn ** [ 8s ]
    Legendash bets [$21]
    Julie21 raises to [$63]
    Legendash goes all-in
    Legendash raises to [$118.55]
    Julie21 calls [$55.55]










    ***** PokerChamps Hand History for Game 200922858 *****
    NL $0.50/$1 Texas Hold'em - Monday, April 23, 14:48:28 GMT 2007
    Table Fluorine 06 6-max (Real Money)
    Seat 5 is the button
    Total number of active players : 5
    Seat 1: emilyrose ( $24.75 )
    Seat 2: T1TS ( $179.04 )
    Seat 3: speeler ( $141.75 )
    Seat 4: crazyvik ( $119.93 )
    Seat 5: Legendash ( $100 )
    Seat 6: byomaaan ( $22.06 )
    byomaaan posts small blind [$0.50]
    emilyrose posts big blind [$1]
    ** Dealing down cards **
    Dealt to Legendash [ :Kd:, :Ks: ]
    T1TS raises to [$3.50]
    crazyvik folds
    Legendash raises to [$11.70]
    byomaaan folds
    emilyrose folds
    T1TS calls [$8.20]
    ** Dealing Flop ** [ :Ts:, :Kh:, :Jc: ]
    T1TS checks
    Legendash bets [$12]
    T1TS raises to [$24]
    Legendash raises to [$56]
    T1TS goes all-in
    T1TS raises to [$167.34]
    Legendash calls [$32.30]
    Legendash goes all-in
    Returning uncalled bet [$79.04] to T1TS
    "[This theory] is only useful for helping to calculate your luck odds. If you have a good read that you have a numerical advantage against your opponent, that your hand is "luckier"..."

    Copyright, Youngdro 2007.
  2. #2
    Hand 1 and 3 are fine.

    Hand 2 i think you can find a fold on the turn raise.
  3. #3
    cardsman1992's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,261
    Location
    Being enjoyed at Jack's Bar since 1397
    Hand one I think you are up against at least a draw and two pair. Multiway with that much action I think you are toast.

    I don't mind hand 2. 57 is in her range, as is 66, but I think 4x shouldn't be.

    Hand 3 is standard IMO, if you ran into AQ then that's tough....
    Operation Grind For Education:

    Current BR: $10080(04/06/2009) BR Goal: $15000--I LOVE RB!!!
    End date: 31aug2009
    Current stakes: $100/200NL FR
  4. #4
    Galapogos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    6,876
    Location
    The Loser's Lounge
    Hand #1: I'd probably just push the rest in once the second guy goes all-in and T1TS calls.

    Hand #2: I have a hard time giving people credit for flopped low trips. If he's unknown I play the same.

    Hand #3: Perfect. If he flopped the straight you have plenty of outs.


    Quote Originally Posted by sauce123
    I don't get why you insist on stacking off with like jack high all the time.
  5. #5
    Legendash's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    585
    Location
    Crypto 6max 100NL
    First hand
    byomaaan shows [ Kd, Kc ] a pair of Kings
    emilyrose mucks [ Kh, 4h ]
    T1TS mucks [ Th, 5h ]
    Legendash shows [ Ac, Ad ] a pair of Aces
    ** Hand Conclusion **
    Legendash wins $111.28 from side pot #2 with a pair of Aces
    Legendash wins $44.43 from side pot #1 with a pair of Aces
    Legendash wins $81.20 from main pot with a pair of Aces

    Phew!

    Second hand, A4
    Third Hand AQ
    "[This theory] is only useful for helping to calculate your luck odds. If you have a good read that you have a numerical advantage against your opponent, that your hand is "luckier"..."

    Copyright, Youngdro 2007.
  6. #6
    Miffed22001's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    10,437
    Location
    Marry Me Cheryl!!!
    2 looked spewy. The others looked.

    having seen results, the only thing we dont beat is KQ or any pair plus oesd, but then we need to gamble versus such a range anyway dont we.

    meh, even against two pair and paird plus oesd combo ranges we have >50% equity so easy gamble in these games.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •