PAHUD

[Numbr2intheWorld]

WHY IS IT NOT WORKING ANYMORE!

[bode]

d0wnload the new version. and download the beta, the other one doesnt recognize preferred seating on stars.

[gabe]

because it wants u to get better as a player

[mcatdog]

because it wants u to get better as a player

owned

I think HUDs are shady and should be banned.

[Galapogos]

because it wants u to get better as a player

owned

I think HUDs are shady and should be banned.

Whaaaat? If a player without a HUD is paying attention to the table and the players at it a HUD offers no advantage. All it does is allow you to play more tables than you could normally play with the amount of info you can hold in your head on its own.

How is that shady if it offers no advantage to a player with a HUD vs a some guy playing as many tables as he should be playing at his optimum capacity without it.

[holdin2]

d0wnload the new version. and download the beta, the other one doesnt recognize preferred seating on stars.

Updating to the bet 1.19 or whatever worked for me. 1.18 had seating wrong. Use the Pokerstars HH option instead of that new memory thing that 1.18 added.

[mcatdog]

Whaaaat? If a player without a HUD is paying attention to the table and the players at it a HUD offers no advantage. All it does is allow you to play more tables than you could normally play with the amount of info you can hold in your head on its own.

Did you even believe this while you were typing it? HUDs make it so much easier to put people on pre-flop ranges and while those ranges aren't always 100% accurate they sure help. I don't think anyone is able to play two tables (let alone eight) and remember precisely how often each player at the table has raised from which positions.

Basically I think all of the software tools that you have to pay for, present a significant barrier to new players entering the game and that's not a good thing. I for one am glad that Stars is banning public databases. Now of course people need to be able to keep a database of their own hands so they can study them when they're done with sessions. But I would prefer if the sites completely banned the use of software during play, and let people get their hand histories via e-mail once their session is over.

I've used software in the past so maybe this makes me a hypocrite, but what's best for multi-tabling low-limit players isn't necessarily what's best for the poker community as a whole.

[gingerwizard]

I havn't been able to use my HUD for 3 months due to laptop slowness. Hasn't affected my winrate at all.

[KoRnholio]

I'm been using Gametime+ for about a year now. Link is on the Pokertracker forums. Is it worth shelling out the $25 to get PAHUD? I checked ou the PAHUD website and didn't see much to make me want to pay for a hud.

[Miffed22001]

because it wants u to get better as a player

gabe do you use a HUD?

[Chopper]

Whaaaat? If a player without a HUD is paying attention to the table and the players at it a HUD offers no advantage. All it does is allow you to play more tables than you could normally play with the amount of info you can hold in your head on its own.

Did you even believe this while you were typing it? HUDs make it so much easier to put people on pre-flop ranges and while those ranges aren't always 100% accurate they sure help. I don't think anyone is able to play two tables (let alone eight) and remember precisely how often each player at the table has raised from which positions.

Basically I think all of the software tools that you have to pay for, present a significant barrier to new players entering the game and that's not a good thing. I for one am glad that Stars is banning public databases. Now of course people need to be able to keep a database of their own hands so they can study them when they're done with sessions. But I would prefer if the sites completely banned the use of software during play, and let people get their hand histories via e-mail once their session is over.

I've used software in the past so maybe this makes me a hypocrite, but what's best for multi-tabling low-limit players isn't necessarily what's best for the poker community as a whole.

good luck getting that wish granted.

btw, maybe you ought to join the PPA and get the US players/fish back into poker again like they were. that would be more profitable, and an easier fix.

[gabe]

because it wants u to get better as a player

gabe do you use a HUD?

no

[Galapogos]

Whaaaat? If a player without a HUD is paying attention to the table and the players at it a HUD offers no advantage. All it does is allow you to play more tables than you could normally play with the amount of info you can hold in your head on its own.

Did you even believe this while you were typing it? HUDs make it so much easier to put people on pre-flop ranges and while those ranges aren't always 100% accurate they sure help. I don't think anyone is able to play two tables (let alone eight) and remember precisely how often each player at the table has raised from which positions.

I used to play 4 tables without a HUD and did just fine, and I'm not an exceptionally bright guy/player. You don't need precise ranges to play well. As long as you pay attention you'll know how you should be playing your hands against certain people.

[IowaSkinsFan]

HUD's are insta ranges preflop so i dont understand why you wouldnt want to use one.
Yes, using one for postflop reads is kind of ridiculous but w/e its a tool that helps for sure.

[|~|ypermegachi]

HUDS allow people who play 15/11 to be profitable grinding 16 tables.