Stars allows 24 tables now...

[kingnat]

Is this bad for FR?... brings out lots of uber-nits.. which in turn brings out shorties...

Do we just say fug it... keep adding tables with minimal adjustment to our game and pwn?...

Does 24-tabling uber-nitish @ 100NL become highly profitable due to bonuses and such?... Time to break out 13-hands strat?

[XTR1000]

what was stars limit before?

My experiences at iPoker, which allows now up to 16 are tables filled with nits and shorties. Idk how stars reward programm works in detail, iPokers bonuses and most rb-deals count rake dealt, not contributed. This circumstance increases players tendency to play more tables and less poker.

Most 0.5/1-nits in my db are winner between 0.5 and 1.8BB/100, mainly b/c 100BB donks, who dont care to stack off w/ TPGK arent rare at peak times.

Instead of 20tables roboting, its way more profitable to 8-table, focused and exploiting the 10/4´s

[bode]

i want to see a video of someone 24 tabling stars 6max "fast" tables

[bigspenda73]

i made a video of me 9 tabling, half was through I said fuck it, I cant keep explaining and playing, so it's just me playing.

I figure I could 16-table with no commentary but the vid would look uber-sketchy.

[martindcx1e]

I would watch a sketchy vid of 12+ tabling.

[bigspenda73]

lol 24-tabling is going to kill the games big time.

Damnit stars gets greedy and kills the fucking games.

[bode]

wont it be super easy to exploit 24 tablers? Just take tons of small pots away from them and fold to any sign of action.

[jyms]

wont it be super easy to exploit 24 tablers? Just take tons of small pots away from them and fold to any sign of action.

Not much joy in that, it wil feel like ajob all day. Raise call, Cbet, fold. 4BB zzzzzzzzzzzz

[kingnat]

The more I think about it, the more I hate it. WTF is the point, honestly...

[martindcx1e]

so i guess they want it to be super easy to be supernova?

[spoonitnow]

lol 24-tabling is going to kill the games big time.

Damnit stars gets greedy and kills the fucking games.

I highly doubt it. I mean seriously, what percentage of players can already play just 12 tables profitably?

[breathweapon]

If people have a problem with it then either Cake or Prima becomes a breeding pool for the fish. I wish these sites would offer semi-private tables where people couldn't be on a semi-private table and a regular table at the same time, so people could have the "online casino" feel of Cake or Prima while not discouraging multi-tabling. I can at most 4 table 6 handed as a LAGG with out a HUD or 9 table 10 handed as a TAGG with a HUD, but there are times I'd rather sit at a single table against thinking opponents with out the TAGG HUD Bots spoiling the fun. I'm not certain whether or not multi tabling TAGGs with HUDs are drying up the ponds, but the fish deserve a place where they can spawn. If you have to catch them the ol' fashioned way, so be it.

[Miffed22001]

if it wasnt already a robotic site...

[kingnat]

So I tried 16-tabling a bit tonight on my 15" laptop screen... I'd say it was moderately successful, +4 buyins at 50NL.. hit plenty of sets, but couldn't hit ANY draw all night.. pretty flushstraighting... i kinda gheyed up the pic a bit.. lo siento... you get the gist though. It's definitely do-able... playing 9-tables after playing 16 for 3 hours is fuggin' CAKE!

[bigspenda73]

ballin

[wufwugy]

Stacking tables and pulling out ones that need more attention then placing them back in the pile once no longer pertinent is soooooooo much easier.

If I didn't need to browse the web to ward off insanity while playing I could 20 table like that all day. 24 is too much for me since I don't autopilot when I enter pots.

[BankItDrew]

i tried 24 tabling 2 cent big blinds yesterday when i first read this thread. lost $15.

wufwugy is right about postflop play being difficult. the preflop play is super robotic on the other hand.

i think i could master a short stacking strat 24 tabling...