|
 Originally Posted by vqc
 Originally Posted by chardrian
If there's a defect in the product then the manufacturer is strictly liable. Negligence would be harder to prove.
Yay torts!!
LOLLLLL
Would this be a manufacturing defect or a design defect, and which would you rather sue under (assuming you had to pick one).
I hope your ok Renton.
if Renton's bottle was the only one that was fucked up, it would be a manufacturing defect (sorta like a mouse in a coke bottle). If all the bottles have the shit that is causing the reaction and the manufacturer didn't provide a warning it would be a design defect (like when you need a recall). In either case the manufacturer is strictly liable so we need Renton to have severely injured himself but not killed himself (dead people are worth less than living cripples) so we can get lots and lots of damages.
yay for bar exam in 3 days!!!
|