|
 Originally Posted by shazbox
 Originally Posted by gabe
im a computer science major and its not too complicated.
but theres already stuff to measure this, but i guess its cool if hes doing it for fun.
I musnt understand it right, it sounds pretty complicated to me.
I guess if you had all the rules they follow written out though it wouldn't be too difficult.
But making them actually play good would be hard. I guess you dont need them to play good though, just to play the same.
...Maybe i am just a really dumb comp sci major.
The way I interpreted the comment (because then it lines up with what I was thinking, haha) is that it would be easy to write a program that allowed you to do a simulation.
I would have a difficult time coming up with an algorithm the modeled decent play, that would be much easier for gabe. In the end, if they're playing the same I don't think it would matter too much. I would expect the graphs to look like a random walk. The thing you wouldn't get by modeling a coin flip is the stdev in BB/hand.
I guess if you came up with a sample distribution of how often the final pot is 2bb, 3bb, 4bb, etc, you could assume 50% chance of winning with a variable weight and that would have to be pretty close.
/rambling
|