|
I don't really agree with your range here SantaCruz. I think we have to weight away from sets because they don't really get played this way. If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it's probably a duck, and this looks and quacks like a big draw (metaphor hell). I think he does have some sets/2pairs in his range *some* of the time, whereas he has big draws in his range all of the time. Also, eh, I guess he can have AA, but I think we have to weight away from that as well, so given that we're making sets less likely, and aces less likely, a set of aces is really unlikely. I think his range looks like this (I'm leaving out some combos to weight away. Dunno if there's a better way of doing this):
Board: 9d Jd Ac
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 65.963% 63.58% 02.39% 9441 354.50 { AhAs, JcJs, JhJs, 9c9h, 9h9s, AdKd, AdQd, AsJs, AdTd, A9s, Ad8d, Ad7d, KdQd, KdTd, QdTd, 8d7d }
Hand 1: 34.037% 31.65% 02.39% 4700 354.50 { AhKc }
He needs to be stone-bluffing hardly ever for us to break even. Remember, we've been pounding on him a little, so he may be frustrated (and let's be honest, this does looks like a big fat bluff, if it's not a combo draw).
|