Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1

    Default Nits (lc)

    $1/$2 No Limit Holdem
    PokerStars
    6 players
    Converted at weaktight.com

    Stacks:
    UTG ($199.00)
    UTG+1 ($226.40)
    CO ($285.45)
    BTN ($187.20)
    Hero ($192.70)
    BB ($200.00)

    Pre-flop: ($3, 6 players) Hero is SB
    4 folds, Hero raises to $6, BB calls $4

    Flop: ($12, 2 players)
    Hero checks, BB checks

    Turn: ($12, 2 players)
    Hero checks, BB checks

    River: ($12, 2 players)
    Hero bets $8, BB calls $8

    Final Pot: $28
    Hero shows:
    BB shows:

    Hero wins $26.65 ( won +$12.65 )
    BB lost -$14.00
  2. #2
    bode's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    8,043
    Location
    slow motion
    ha ha. love it.
    eeevees are not monies yet...they are like baby monies.
  3. #3
    bode's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    8,043
    Location
    slow motion
    i can see checking the flop sometimes, but why check the turn?
    eeevees are not monies yet...they are like baby monies.
  4. #4
    a500lbgorilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    28,082
    Location
    himself fucker.
    "He didnt bet flop. That means set or underpair... gotta check to induce."

    "FCK Look at how many aces beat me! ALL OF THEM!"

    "CRY"
    <a href=http://i.imgur.com/kWiMIMW.png target=_blank>http://i.imgur.com/kWiMIMW.png</a>
  5. #5
    Why lack of turn bet? Nit vs nit check/check violence lol
    "How could I call that bet? How could you MAKE that bet? It's poker not solitaire. " - that Gus Bronson guy
  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Vrax
    Why lack of turn bet?
    Hands that a nit will call a turn bet with: anything with an ace (split pot), sets (and then just for the 'house draw, and there's no way he has a set anyway), and that's it. Much better to check and get the disbelief call on the river. He'd fold all of his one and two pairs, more than likely, to any decent-sized turn bet; but he would call with some of them on the river after a turn check/check.
  7. #7
    I figure that after his flop check his range is like 88-22 and perhaps some non-broadway SCs. So it's either bet to induce or check to induce. No way I thought he was ghey enough to check KQ behind on the flop.
  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Fnord
    No way I thought he was ghey enough to check KQ behind on the flop.
    He was scared shitless of your flop open-check, he put you on JJ-KK/AT.
    "How could I call that bet? How could you MAKE that bet? It's poker not solitaire. " - that Gus Bronson guy
  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Vrax
    He was scared shitless of your flop open-check, he put you on JJ-KK/AT.
    More likely he put me on air.
  10. #10
    will641's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    5,266
    Location
    getting my swell on
    this guy isnt a nit hes just super trixsky and you guys cant appreciate it.
    Cash Rules Everything Around Me.
  11. #11
    u guys both played it fine imo
    when the vpip's are high and the value bets are like razors, who can be safe?
  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by Genitruc
    u guys both played it fine imo
    wat?
  13. #13
    bjsaust's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    6,347
    Location
    Ballarat, Australia
    Quote Originally Posted by a500lbgorilla
    "FCK Look at how many aces beat me! ALL OF THEM!"
    Thankyou for my morning LOL .
    Just dipping my toes back in.
  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by Fnord
    Quote Originally Posted by Genitruc
    u guys both played it fine imo
    wat?
    rly?

    flop : how many hands is he calling with that you are crushing?

    Not many. So from your perspective, checking is fine since you're hard-pressed to call a raise and even if he calls, you'll be oop in a pot where lots of cards help him and pretty much none (except Tx) help you.

    From his perspective, your hand looks like a very weak hand that's either gonna fold (88ish) or a hand that he can likely get 1 street of value out of (J8, AJ... but you'd probably bet all of the Ax where X is a pair).

    So he can either underrep his hand and hope you call his "bluff" on the turn or riv or just blow you off your hand right now

    On the turn, it's unlikely you're ever getting 2 streets of value. I agree that it looks bluffier to come out and bet the turn because of the implied threat of 2-barreling the riv, but do you really expect him to call you down on 2 streets without an ace?

    From his perspective, what hands are you calling with on the turn that he can extract from on the riv? Also, if you have an ace, why not check behind and fill up?

    Riv is played fine both ways imo
    when the vpip's are high and the value bets are like razors, who can be safe?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •