aces slowly vs good lag 100nl

[daven]

villain is jennys_mom, a decent winning reg at 100nl and 200nl, also 400nl i think.
17-15 and 8% 3-bet over 2k hands at 100nl, read is that villain grabs weakness and is super-aggressive.
villain likely perceives me as tilt-prone and a bit weak (i.e. fold too easily), also aggressive, with very standard lines in 3-bet situations preflop

Given reads, is this line pretty standard? I'm insta-checking flop and turn, calling pre and on flop after a few seconds pause
a pre-flop 3-bet would fold most of villain's range, and reads mean i'm pretty happy stacking off on most flops if required.
Full Tilt No-Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (8 handed) - Full-Tilt Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com

Hero (MP1) ($150.80)
MP2 ($100)
CO ($100)
Button ($128.05)
SB ($155.25)
BB ($100)
UTG ($112.90)
UTG+1 ($36.35)

Preflop: Hero is MP1 with A, A
2 folds, Hero raises to $3.50, 1 fold, CO raises to $12, 3 folds, Hero calls $8.50

Flop: ($25.50) 9, 9, 6 (2 players)
Hero checks, CO bets $15, Hero calls $15

Turn: ($55.50) 7 (2 players)
Hero checks, CO bets $73 (All-In), Hero calls $73

[bigspenda73]

lulz well he obv. has air on the turn

big debate on how to play the turn in this spot on FTR lately. Against this guy I like checking and letting him attempt to continue with a bluff.

[BankItDrew]

looks good

[elipsesjeff]

Postflop seems pretty standard but you should be 4bet bluffing him when he reraises you so I'd use that to merge AA into my 4betting range preflop.

[Stacks]

Postflop seems pretty standard but you should be 4bet bluffing him when he reraises you so I'd use that to merge AA into my 4betting range preflop.

+1.

[Parasurama]

Postflop seems pretty standard but you should be 4bet bluffing him when he reraises you so I'd use that to merge AA into my 4betting range preflop.

I agree with this but why does it seem that people never 4bet KK?

[Deanglow]

yeah you should be 4bet bluffing but I don't think this situation calls for it. nice hand imo

[Miffed22001]

like the whole plan - but id prefer the 4bet yada as above vs a LAGG - id use this line against an aggro TAGG

[badgers]

yeah you should be 4bet bluffing but I don't think this situation calls for it. nice hand imo

yeah i mean if there is no 3/4bet history then this is better imo especially as daven is a little bit nitty I think...?

He's just going to fold the vast majority of his 3bet range if we 4bet and if we call he'll probs cbet far too big with 100% of his range and double barrel too often, as well as vtowning himself with KK. This line exploits all of those possible leaks.

[daven]

especially as daven is a little bit nitty I think...?
.

touche, but you have a point. I'm working on loosening up though, learning heaps by doing so. Went too far for a while (18-14 = not for me in Full Ring). Funny, the HUD-bots with loads of history on me may start getting confused soon.

Year to date I'm running 16-12 with 4% 3-bet, 31% steal, 60% fold to 3-bet, and 10% 4-bet. About the level of nittiness I like.
I'm still probably a little too nitty post-flop though