Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumShort-Handed NL Hold'em

tagg vs tagg, am I insane here?

Results 1 to 27 of 27
  1. #1
    dev's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,624
    Location
    swonging and swonging

    Default tagg vs tagg, am I insane here?

    Table was playing tight. V is a tagg who had shown down some light 3bets. I'd been very agro preflop and cbetting a lot but not going nuts after the flop.

    Cake Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $4.00 BB (6 handed) - Cake-Poker Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com

    BB ($436.20)
    Hero (UTG) ($443.80)
    MP ($446.50)
    CO ($430.40)
    Button ($468.70)
    SB ($635)

    Preflop: Hero is UTG with 9, 10
    Hero bets $14, 1 fold, CO raises to $48, 3 folds, Hero calls $34

    Flop: ($102) A, 8, 8 (2 players)
    Hero checks, CO bets $68, Hero raises to $136, CO calls $68

    Turn: ($374) Q (2 players)
    Hero raises to $259.80 (All-In)
    Check out my self-deprecation here!
  2. #2
    I'm confused... I expected an example of TAGG play and I don't see any?

    It's a good semi-bluff on the turn there, but I would wager you're going to get looked up a lot from the CO who is obviously quite interested in this hand by not being scared off from the check/min-raise (hi there I've got a set, but not likely on this board)

    Meh, why not just fold this pre and be done with it? what made this happen?
    Hey knucklehead! Bonk!
  3. #3
    bjsaust's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    6,347
    Location
    Ballarat, Australia

    Default Re: tagg vs tagg, am I insane here?

    Quote Originally Posted by dev
    I'd been very agro preflop and cbetting a lot but not going nuts after the flop.
    I guess you put an end to that .

    I dont think flop is bad as a pure bluff, and turn is probably fine afterwards, but its really unnecessary. I think this is one of those spots that becomes better if we have more equity on the flop. We got the 2nd bet card in the deck for us on the turn, we normally wont be that lucky.
    Just dipping my toes back in.
  4. #4
    under the gun 9 10 is a fold suited or not
    maybe i read wrong books
  5. #5
    bode's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    8,043
    Location
    slow motion
    bet sizing and everything else looks really good, but this is the wrong flop texture to pull this on. like bj said, it would be nice to have SOME equity on the flop before pulling the trigger.
    eeevees are not monies yet...they are like baby monies.
  6. #6
    I really don't like this hand. I'd just fold pre, rather than calling a 3bet OOP here.I'm not sure how light he's 3betting your UTG open?

    On the flop, what value hand would you ever play like this?

    You're going to 4bet AK pre mostly.
    Are you really going to c/r AQ on this flop, instead of letting him bluff on such a dry board? I really don't think you're repping anything here at all.

    If he has air, this works. But I'm not sure if hands like KK/QQ are even betting this flop too often, so you're getting snapped on this turn here a lottt once he b/c's flop. Especially now that all weakish Aces, if he did have those, thinks they are chopping.

    Back to my original question though, what value hand would you ever play like this?
    Quote Originally Posted by Jay-Z
    I'm a couple hands down and I'm tryin' to get back
    I gave the other grip, I lost a flip for five stacks
  7. #7
    dev's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,624
    Location
    swonging and swonging
    I think he cbets his whole range on the flop, but I also figured he'd fold to anything with 99-KK, hence the c/minraise. The turn card was so good for me I just kinda immediately went for the bomb. After thinking about it, I may have like 0 FE there.
    Check out my self-deprecation here!
  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by dev
    I think he cbets his whole range on the flop,
    I agree with this, and I agree that he bets all his air on this flop for sure.

    BUT, I'd like this a lot more if you were CO and he was BTN and his range has a LOT more air in it, than c/r vs his 3betting range vs your UTG open.

    If you're going to get fancy, at least get fancy when his range is weak AND you can rep something credible.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jay-Z
    I'm a couple hands down and I'm tryin' to get back
    I gave the other grip, I lost a flip for five stacks
  9. #9
    Jack Sawyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    7,668
    Location
    Jack-high straight flush motherfucker
    yeti theorem suggests CO ain't bluffin
    My dream... is to fly... over the rainbow... so high...


    Cogito ergo sum

    VHS is like a book? and a book is like a stack of kindles.
    Hey, I'm in a movie!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYdwe3ArFWA
  10. #10
    nutsinho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,839
    Location
    flattin ur 4bets, makin u tilt
    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Sawyer
    yeti theorem suggests CO ain't bluffin
    really
    My bankroll is the amount of money I would spend or lose before I got a job. It is calculated by adding my net worth to whatever I can borrow.
  11. #11
    Jack Sawyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    7,668
    Location
    Jack-high straight flush motherfucker
    Quote Originally Posted by nutsinho
    really
    yep, this probably explains it better

    Quote Originally Posted by griffey24
    so you're getting snapped on this turn here a lottt once he b/c's flop
    My dream... is to fly... over the rainbow... so high...


    Cogito ergo sum

    VHS is like a book? and a book is like a stack of kindles.
    Hey, I'm in a movie!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYdwe3ArFWA
  12. #12
    dev's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,624
    Location
    swonging and swonging
    Yeti theorem says if he comes over the top of my CiB he's almost always bluffing. That doesn't necessarily mean that he's not bluffing when he c-bets.
    Check out my self-deprecation here!
  13. #13
    Galapogos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    6,876
    Location
    The Loser's Lounge
    Yeti theorem is dead.


    Quote Originally Posted by sauce123
    I don't get why you insist on stacking off with like jack high all the time.
  14. #14
    wow my head hurts, i dont see yeti theorem or a CiB in this hand. I just fold pf
    Flopping quads and boats like its my job
  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by thizzSantaCruz
    wow my head hurts, i dont see yeti theorem or a CiB in this hand. I just fold pf
  16. #16
    bode's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    8,043
    Location
    slow motion
    Quote Originally Posted by Galapogos
    Yeti theorem is dead.
    this
    eeevees are not monies yet...they are like baby monies.
  17. #17
    bjsaust's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    6,347
    Location
    Ballarat, Australia
    I like and respect you dev, but I hate when people call a normal minraise a cib.
    Just dipping my toes back in.
  18. #18
    This hand is really retarded and has no balance.
  19. #19
    bjsaust's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    6,347
    Location
    Ballarat, Australia
    I think one thing to learn here. Sometimes we call with speculative hands PF planning to "take it away" postflop if we miss, but sometimes the board just doesnt support that. If its not a balanced spot where we would play that way with a nut hand, then its not a great spot to bluff.
    Just dipping my toes back in.
  20. #20
    XTR1000's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    3,548
    Location
    surfing in a room
    Quote Originally Posted by bjsaust
    If its not a balanced spot where we would play that way with a nut hand, then its not a great spot to bluff.
    aka ISF theorem
    Quote Originally Posted by bigred View Post
    xtr stand for exotic tranny retards
    yo
  21. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by bjsaust
    I think one thing to learn here. Sometimes we call with speculative hands PF planning to "take it away" postflop if we miss, but sometimes the board just doesnt support that. If its not a balanced spot where we would play that way with a nut hand, then its not a great spot to bluff.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jay-Z
    I'm a couple hands down and I'm tryin' to get back
    I gave the other grip, I lost a flip for five stacks
  22. #22
    elipsesjeff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    4,826
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    I can see us maybe playing AK/AA this way but its such a small range to represent and is so unlikely for us to have given earlier action that it can't be a good spot for us to bluff. That said, it'd be a pretty good way to get value when we do have AK/AA because it wouldn't make sense for us to have it.


    Check out my videos at Grinderschool.com

    More Full Ring NLHE Cash videos than ANY other poker training site. Training starts at $10/month.
  23. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by griffey24
    Quote Originally Posted by bjsaust
    I think one thing to learn here. Sometimes we call with speculative hands PF planning to "take it away" postflop if we miss, but sometimes the board just doesnt support that. If its not a balanced spot where we would play that way with a nut hand, then its not a great spot to bluff.
    Yeah this. You don't have to go crazy on all flops. Make sure you know which ones before you call in these situations preflop. Otherwise you'll be spewing and you'd be way better of folding preflop.
  24. #24
    I think it probably makes sense to go for a free card on the turn, even if you feel dumb checking. I imagine I probably would've just gone all-in in the heat of the moment too. I pretty much agree with what everyone else is saying otherwise.
  25. #25
    Open pre is fine.

    Fold to threebet.

    On flop: If we were going to bluff here ever I guess this is the hand we'd do it with right? Just fold to flop cbet. I don't think a minraise here is horrible, but its certainly bad.
    Check out the new blog!!!
  26. #26
    dev's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,624
    Location
    swonging and swonging
    [ ] thinks about FE before semibluffing
    [x] not horrible, just bad
    [ ] doesn't understand what CiB means
    [x] understands what yeti theorem is
    [x] Yeti is dead, babe, Yeti is dead.

    edited for bsjaust's gracious teachings
    Check out my self-deprecation here!
  27. #27
    bjsaust's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    6,347
    Location
    Ballarat, Australia
    bet, raise, min-raise = CiB
    bet, min-raise = min-raise
    Just dipping my toes back in.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •