|
[quote="Ragnar4"]
You're trying to remove the idea that any sort of a professional action cannot be considered a contribution to society, and that's simply wrong.[/quopte]
dude, please rewrite this without the double negatives. Seriously, I dont even know what youre trying to say that Im trying to say, know what Im saying?
Most professional contributions to society are neither positive nor negative. Dealing drugs is decidedly a negative, for the sake of this argument.
Not sure why this is a given, but yes was using "drug dealing" as a negative in my example.
Art is such an odd thing to be considered a "societal contribution"
it is?
I pose this quiestion: Is our world any better for the Mona Lisa sitting in the Louvre? I'm thinking no.
Im thinking you are simply ignorant to the affects that art has on society. Its influences are felt in nearly everything we interact with, if not everything. That painting is not just something that tourist peer at while vacationing. That painting, and art as a whole, provides inspiration for creative minds.
That being said, we can replace artist with any sort of passive contributor to society, such as biographer, philosopher, inventor, physicist, historian, ect. Are you really interested in arguing that any, much less, all of these pursuits do not better mankind?
|