|
dude i was very amazed when i did it too given that my max 1 rep was somewhere between 350-400 and max deadlift was somewhere between 440-480 at the time. the set was very long, and apparently with the rest given to the legs and ass when the knees are locked gave me more recovery than i expected. also, i suspect that the set had something to do with me injuring my back, and i couldnt have done it again without several months rest. that was during a couple month period of where i was gung ho on lower body almost non stop and i tweaked something attempting a max sumo deadlift following the day of a max regular deadlift. stupid, i know now, and i knew then...
I think there's a very good chance that your form started getting sloppy which contributed to your back injury. I see it all the time when people go too heavy and still try to get low, or they are getting fatigued after doing some reps. What inevitably starts happening is the hips stay high and the back starts rounding more and more. It gets to the point where I feel obligated to quietly point it out to them at some point; most don't listen but I'd hate to see somebody get catastrophically injured because I didn't point out their irresponsible and dangerous form. I'm not saying this definitely applies to you, but it just sounds very familiar.
also, fwiw, ive never worked out in a gym. only in the backyard in the elements. however, from the forums ive heard all about the horror stories of gym goers squating 1/4 depth and thinking its an olympic squat. ive done a ton of back squats, front squats, and zercher squats and the two former were always oly style (full extension and hams plastered fully on calves) and the zerchers were parallel i.e. hip joint/flexors parallel with hamstring/knee insertion point, the way powerlifting judges it (holding the bar in the elbow joints pretty much makes it impossible to go below parallel unless you want to alter the moment arm and thus drastically reduce the amount of load youre able to put on the hips/legs in place of load placed on shoulders, which is undesirable when doing squats).
It's funny how people let their ego cloud their judgment. As a general rule, if people think they are hitting parallel they are really doing about a quarter squat; if they think they are going full they might be getting to parallel, often with a good amount of back rounding as well. Of course there is the occasional oddball that does the movement(s) right, but they are in the minority.
I think the chain of events that leads to all this awful form goes something like this: Iron junkie gets introduced to the weight room in school or through their friends or whatever and starts doing lots of bench pressing (which, relatively speaking, they become quite good at), curling, and maybe a trivial amount of lat pulldowns or leg press or what not.
Then when they start squatting (if they start squatting), they don't give themselves the proper learning curve. While an ideally trained athlete should squat more than they press, most people are far more skilled at the bench press than they are at the squat (of course I've seen so many idiots who bounce the bar off their chest from a free fall that it makes me question this, but we are speaking relatively here) so it doesn't really apply here. And forget about the oly squat here, nobody actually does that. (except me)
Since the most you can expect an average gym rat to do is hit parallel, now is as good a place as any to talk a bit about powerlifting. A typical squat:bench L ratio thrown out is 4:3:5. Obviously, a person benching 300 would be more or less expected to be able to squat 400 and deadlift 500. There are all sorts of factors based on height, weight, body type, gear, etc.
In the squat for example, the knee wraps and other gear help get this number where it is. The form isn't predicated on building quads but by initiating the movement with the hips in a very wide stance to put most of the stress on the posterior chain.
So to take all these factors where it would be expected that someone squats more than they bench and apply it to the person who is lifting raw (maybe with a belt or something which inevitably is worn too loose to be of any good anyway), that is unskilled squatting, maybe even going for a true olympic squat which is obviously going to be lighter, it's just a recipe for disaster.
Either the above, or people are just idiots and try using too much weight in general. probably a bit of both.
I'll add here that I put a great deal of effort into getting my lifts up and I think they are respectable, especially of someone of my size and body type (6'2", longish limbs, ~190, dieted down from ~215). But I invariably have great form on the major lifts (controlled cheating on what not on some relatively light iso movement isn't particularly relevant here).
I've never done zerchers and to be honest it (to me) seems like an inferior movement.
i started lifting again a week ago and it looks like ive been able to mitigate the pain, so when i have several months in ill post vid of doing an appreciable amount of weight at full squat
I'm interested in this.
but that was a long time ago. today i did 2 sets of 20 reps with 135 on deadlifts. soooooooo weak, mainly lack of gpp tho. i used to warm up with that shit. jesus....
Only 2 words need to be said-- Muscle memory.
Another way to put it is in 7 or so years of lifting, I've probably only seen a handful of other people do them, so you're already ahead of the curve.
|