|
 Originally Posted by NightGizmo
How did you decide on that bluff 3betting range? Is that basically the hands that are just outside your flat calling range?
That is something I need to improve on, too, so advice is appreciated.
No, it's hands that aren't dominated by the range with which they flat our 3bet.
My thinking is basically that most of the players we'll be targetting at 10nl have a pretty narrow range of hands with which they flat a 3bet:
So, firstly we're trying to target players who have a high F3bet%, so that we should always have good fold equity.
Players with a high F3bet% will also generally be playing pretty tight so they will have a very narrow range of hands with which they will continue against a 3bet, let's say for the sake of argument AK, AQ, AJs, QQ, JJ, TT (obviously we adjust this for each villain).
We therefore really don't want to be 3betting with ATs because it's so easy for us to be dominated against this range. So, I'd rather 3bet with hands like medium suited connectors, one gappers etc: Primarily we're making money here by villain folding 70%+ of the time, but when he calls our 3bet, his range is so narrow that we can be pretty clear where we are and can potentially pwn him postflop with a hand that is well disguised, rather than getting in trouble with a hand which is dominated by his range.
Would appreciate feedback from Spoon, Oskar et al if I'm in the right ball park with my thinking here.
<awaits smackdown>
|