Believe I have found leak in my game, would like opinions

[B-squared]

I was trawling this forum the other day, and stumbled on a thread by ISF, about how a common flaw in the break-even player's game was calling too often, and that taking an approach of bet/raising could potentially be more profitable. I took the post fairly lightly, thinking "Lulz @ nubs that calL 2 mucch teh big one1!1!!"
Until I realised all of a sudden, that I had been neglecting this simple teaching in favour of calling an unreasonable amount of suited connectors, at pretty much any kind of table, as long as the pot was unraised.

So my question: @ a Full ring, typically TAG table (no reads, as if you had just sat down), where is your cut-off position to playing medium suited connectors? Around: J9s,T8s+,97s+,86s+,75s+,64s+,54s
I ask this, because generally I have been playing these in what i anticipate is far too many positions.

Thanks for the feedback, sorry if the question is unclear. Drunk.

[WeaselT]

If you have tracking software, I would suggest looking at those hands by position. Look at what is winning and what is not and from where. Stop playing the losers. It will likely be different for everyone, so you're better off working with yours. At a table full of unknowns tho I try to keep that crap in the CO or BU maybe HJ. Bet/fold is gold, learn it love it.

[oskar]

Depends so much on stack sizes. With 80-120bb stacks and no aggro reg IP, you can start raising 9Ts+ from MP and work your way down to suited gap connectors otb. As stacks get shallower and esp with decent shortstackers left to act, you should be just folding most of those.