|
Okay. Here are the results with my thoughts on why I played these the way I did.
Hand 1:
Showdown:
yeldud shows Ah 6h.
yeldud has Ah 6h 6s Ad Ac: full house, aces full of sixes.
PopeInnocent mucks cards.
(PopeInnocent has Jd 8d.)
Hand #3452769-3299 Summary:
$2 is raked from a pot of $48.
yeldud wins $46 with full house, aces full of sixes.
1) Based on my reads this opponent would have folded on the turn with any bet. Feeling I had the hand won (I did not put him on an A) I felt that betting the turn would not have allowed me to maximize value. I was fairly certain that he would call a river bet.
The conclusion of this hand led to much table talk including "horribly played by me", "Interesting Play" and others that agreed with my play with "well played" and "nice betting"
Given my reads, would anyone have done anything different?
Hand 2:
Showdown:
yeldud shows 8s 9c.
yeldud has 8s 9c Jc Td 7d: straight, jack high.
PopeInnocent shows Jh 2h.
PopeInnocent has Jh Jc Td 7d Ah: a pair of jacks.
Hand #3452769-3302 Summary:
$1.90 is raked from a pot of $39.60.
yeldud wins $37.70 with straight, jack high.
On the flop, I put him on top pair, but obviously I did not care. I did fear a diamond draw and tried to end this on the turn, figuring if he wants to hit his draw, he will have to go all in to do it. Also, this is 3 hands after the full house hand, so he was steaming and probably would have bet anything against me.
Fortunately for me this player re-bought after this hand
Any feedback as to the plays is greatly appreciated.
|