|
Whoops, I misread this hand history. I didn't see the first raise the aces guy made. But this makes it even stranger. He raises 4xBB (which I would think was a weaker hand at first), then you minraise, then he minraises back, then you minraise again (!!!), then he goes all in. Minraise mania!
In this case, I'm fine with dwarfy's choice of shoving, if you have a read of a lower pair because of the big opening bet, AND he's shown a tendeny to minraise with other hands (as in, against Lefou, by all means you call here), and that's why you kept minraising.
Normally though, I'm really not for minraising at all, but especially repeatedly preflop with KK. It just becomes amazingly obvious that you have an absolute monster, and a decent player is going to pick up on that and would not have done his shove without AA (and maybe wouldn't have even done the minrereraise), which again means I may have been able to get away from the hand once he shoves. All depends on the player really.
I mean, if he had QQ-TT, do you really think he's going to see your minraise and not either raise more or just call? He's going to minraise you again, tempting you to raise more and providing no incentive for you to fold, and then see you minraise again, still have no fear, and shove?
Also, here is a big big problem that I just noticed:
Obviously I dont want him to put me all in..
...... ?!?!?!?!?! Why the hell did you keep minraising him then?! The only hand you shouldn't want him to put you all in with is AA, and if you suspect he has that, why would you put in the last minraise? Obviously it wasn't to get information, because he shoved and you still called. The only reason your minraising made sense to me was if you were pretty sure he had a smaller pair, but that line completely throws that out the window, making your play completely irrational.
|