|
 Originally Posted by Grand_MasterB
You are playing heads up and when playign against just one other opponent the odds of you two both getting such monsters is so slim that i pay it off every time it does happen and i know i will still come out way ahead in the long run.
I'm not sure if I agree with this logic. Yes, the nut flush is a very good hand here even with the paired board, but the question isn't the odds of both players getting a monster head up, the question is how many solid players with worse hands will make a huge bet on the river and call your raise on the river (or reraise). The odds of having KK up against AA are very low, but if two or more people are allin preflop, the conditional probability of this unfortunate event (if you have the kings) is much higher. How many times have you made a call, thinking to yourself "No way they have an XX...." and that's exactly what they flip up? Also, how many times have you been in a similar position on the river, raised, and had the other person with deep stack push allin, forcing you to call with what you now almost know is the worse hand?
Looking at the board and the preflop raise, I think only A8 or KQ, QJ, Q10 of diamonds would be able to call here, while QQ, 22 and 55 and maybe Q8 would probably play about the same way and would be begging for your raise. Because hardly any hands that you are beating would call, and hands that have you crushed would push, I think a call is marginally correct here, especially given the large pot and continued strength shown by helfdan (and the continued passivity of SmackinYaUp). However, if your opponent is aggressive enough to be making a 20$ bet on the river without a boat, and makes loose enough calls with medium-strength hands to justify raising, then I think your minimum raise on the river is a very nice move.
For a hypothetical: what if you both had equal stacks preflop, you played the hand the same way and made the same raise on the river, you have the same read on your opponent, and he pushed over the top?
|